Disposed

J.Jayapaul Mohan v. The Principal Secretary to

Madras HC16 Dec 2024WP/40610/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition by a suspended Assistant Executive Engineer challenging denial of retirement due to pending disciplinary proceedings. His subsequent dismissal was under challenge in a pending writ appeal. The court held relief practically infructuous and directed conclusion of all pending disciplinary proceedings within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to first respondent to conclude all pending disciplinary proceedings within three months and communicate decision to petitioner.

J.Jayapaul Mohan Vs The Principal Secretary to — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.40610 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 16.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

¶6

W.P.No.40610 of 2015

¶7

1 J.Jayapaul Mohan Assistant Executive Engineer (under Suspension), Public Works Department, No.67, Perumal Reddy Street, Egmore Chennai-5.

¶8

... PETITIONER

¶9

¶10

1 The Principal Secretary To Government, Public Works Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

¶11

2 The Engineer-in-Chief, WRD And The Chief Engineer (Genl.) PWD, Chepauk, Chennai- 600 005. ...

¶12

RESPONDENTS

¶13

PRAYER: This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of CERTIORARI calling for the entire records pertaining to the order passed by the 1st respondent in G.O.(D) No.145, Public Works (E1) Department dated 29.05.2015 and quash the same as illegal arbitrary unreasonable being vitrine of rules and principles of natural justice and thereby direct the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to retire from service with effect from 31.05.2015 with all monetary and service benefits.

¶14

Page 1 of 5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.40610 of 2015

¶17

For Petitioner ... Mr.A.R.Suresh For Respondents ... Mr.P.Ganesan Additional Government Pleader

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order issued by the first respondent in G.O.(D) No.145, Public Works (E1) Department, dated 29.05.2015, whereby, the petitioner was not allowed to retire from service

¶20

because of the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner even after attaining the age of superannuation.

¶21

2.When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to the notice of this Court by Mr.Ganesan, learned Additional Government Pleader that the petitioner herein was subsequently dismissed from service by issuing order in G.O.(4D).No.51, Public Works (E2) Department, dated 23.03.2021 and such an order was challenged by filing the writ petition in W.P.No.1173 of 2022 and the said writ petition also has been dismissed by the learned single judge of this Court on 01.03.2024. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a writ appeal has been preferred against the said order dated 01.03.2024 and the same is pending.

¶22

Page 2 of 5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.40610 of 2015

¶25

3.Be that as it may, by virtue of the order of dismissal on 23.03.2021

¶26

passed against the petitioner, the relief sought for in this writ petition has practically become infructuous. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner was dismissed from service on one charge, other disciplinary proceedings that are pending against the petitioner since long and appropriate orders be passed to complete the disciplinary proceedings in all those pending matters.

¶27

4.Considering the same, the writ petition is disposed of directing the

¶28

first respondent to conclude all the disciplinary proceedings, which are pending against the petitioner as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate such decision to the petitioner.

¶29

Index : Yes/No 16.12.2024 Internet : Yes/No sms

¶30

Page 3 of 5

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.40610 of 2015

¶33

¶34

1 The Principal Secretary To Government, Public Works Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

¶35

2 The Engineer-in-Chief, WRD And The Chief Engineer (Genl.) PWD, Chepauk, Chennai- 600 005.

¶36

3 The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

¶37

Page 4 of 5

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.No.40610 of 2015

¶40

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

¶41

sms

¶42

W.P.No.40610 of 2015

¶43

16.12.2024

¶44

Page 5 of 5

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

J.Jayapaul Mohan v. The Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Jayapaul Mohan v. The Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Ramalingam, Vs The Govt of Tamil Nadu

P.Kaliraj, Vs the Superintendent

J.Jayapaul Mohan Vs The Principal Secretary to

M.Gulam Ahmed Vs The Additional Chief Secretary

K.Balachandran Vs The Director of Town

M.Manjula, Vs Pondicherry Market Committee