Allowed

M/s.Green Channel Cargo Care v. Union of India

Madras HC7 Nov 2024WP/40508/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions filed under Article 226 challenging Rule 5 (1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 as ultra vires were allowed. The High Court relied on the Supreme Court judgment (2018 G.S.T.L. 401) which upheld the striking down of the same provision by the Delhi High Court.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions are accordingly allowed, declaring the impugned rule ultra vires and unlawful, and connected miscellaneous petitions are closed with no order as to costs.

M/s.Green Channel Cargo Care Vs Union of India — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.Nos.40508 & 40701 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.11.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P.Nos.40508 & 40701 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.34541 & 34701 of 2016

¶7

M/s.Green Channel Cargo Care Private Limited, No.81, Coral Merchant Street, II Floor, Chennai 600001, Represented by its Managing Director, Shri.Pavan Kumar Reddy. ... Petitioner in W.P.No.40508 of 2016

¶8

M/s.Sri Selvaganapathy & Co. 2^nd Floor, Old No.14, New No.31, Moore Street, Chennai 600 001, Represented by its Managing Partner, Shri G.Selvaganapthy. ... Petitioner in W.P.No.40701 of 2016 Vs.

¶9

1.Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001, Represented by its Secretary.

¶10

2.The Central Board of Excise and Customs, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001, Represented by its Chairman.

¶11

3.The Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals – I), Newry Towers, 2054/1, II Avenue, 12^th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. ... Respondents in both WPs Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶12

Page 1 of 4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.Nos.40508 & 40701 of 2016

¶15

India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Declaration to declare the Rule 5 (1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 as Ultra Vires and unlawful.

¶16

W.P.No.40508 of 2016

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Satish Sundar For Respondents : Mr.Rajendran Raghavan Senior Standing Counsel

¶18

W.P.No.40701 of 2016

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Satish Sundar For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel

¶20

COMMON ORDER

¶21

(Order of the Court is made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J. )

¶22

The prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions is to declare the Rule 5 (1)

¶23

of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 as Ultra Vires and unlawful.

¶24

2.The very same provision has already been under challenge. From a

¶25

reported decision of the Delhi Hight Court, in 2013 (29) STR 9 (Del.) in the matter of Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt.Ltd Vs. Union of India by judgment dated 30.11.2012, the Delhi High Court had declared the said provision as ultra vires and accordingly, struck off. When this decision was appealed to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.2013 of 2014 with

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Page 2 of 4

¶28

W.P.Nos.40508 & 40701 of 2016

¶29

C.A.Nos.295-299 etc., those cases also had been decided by the Hon'ble

¶30

Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt.Ltd reported in 2018 (10) G.S.T.L. 401 (S.C.), where the judgment of the Delhi High Court has been upheld.

¶31

3.In that view of the matter, since a quietus has been given where the provision which is under challenge in these Writ Petitions has already been struck down, these Writ Petitions have to be allowed.

¶32

4.Accordingly, these Writ Petitions stand allowed. Consequently,

¶33

connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶34