Two writ petitions against commercial tax revision orders were dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioners failed to appear on two hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.Nos.40044 of 2005 & 2612 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.08.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
W.P.Nos.40044 of 2005 & 2612 of 2006
and
W.V.M.P.No.207 of 2007
M/s.Allwin Colours, Tnandakkaran Thottam, Murugampalayam, Tirupur, Coimbatore District Rep. by its Partner. .. Petitioner in WP 40044/05
M/s.Gowtham Dyers 272, Kuppandampalayam, Veerapandin Post,Tirupur, Coimbatore District. Rep. by its Partner K.Chandraprabha . Petitioner in WP 2612/06
vs
2.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Tirupur (Rural) Circle, Tirupur, Coimbatore District. .. Respondents in both WPs
Prayer in W.P.No.40444 of 2005: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent in R.P.No.JJ2/RP 274/2004, quash the order dated 6-7-05.
Prayer in W.P.No.2612 of 2006: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent in R.P.No.JJ2/45/2005, quash the order dated 26-10-05.
1/2
W.P.Nos.40044 of 2005 & 2612 of 2006
DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J. and
G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
The matter had come up for hearing on 06.08.2024 when the petitioner is called absent. Hence, it was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', when also, the petitioner is unrepresented. Hence, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 14.08.2024 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm
To
W.P.Nos.40044 of 2005 & 2612 of 2006
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s.Allwin Colours
M/s.Gowtham Dyers
The Joint Commissioner (CT)
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Tirupur (Rural) Circle
Anita Sumanth
G. Arul Murugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
