Petitioners sought a declaration against denial of voting rights in the Madras High Court Advocates Association election. Counsel sought leave to withdraw with an endorsement; the Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:MHC:2252
WP No.383 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11-06-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM And THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
WP No.383 of 2023 And
WMP No.351 of 2023
1.R.Sankarasubbu
2.G.Paventhan .. Petitioners
-vs-
1.The Teller Committee, Represented by it Chairman, Madras High Court Advocates Association, High Court Campus, Chennai-600 112.
Page 1 of 4
WP No.383 of 2023
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Declaration, to declare the notice issued by the respondents dated 19.12.2022 in so far as denying the voting right to us for the respondent's association election and further direct the respondent to give voting right for us in the election scheduled on 09.01.2023.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Parthasarathi For Respondents : Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar
O R D E R
[ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE
BY S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks the permission of
this Court that he wants to withdraw the present Writ Petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners also made an endorsement to the said effect in the bundle. Accordingly, this Court granted permission to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
Page 2 of 4
WP No.383 of 2023
by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the present
Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.) (C.KUMARAPPAN,J.)
11-06-2024
Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Svn
To
1.The Chairman, Teller Committee, Madras High Court Advocates Association, High Court Campus, Chennai-600 112.
2.The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, Represented by its Secretary, Madras High Court Campus, Chennai-600 104.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
AND
Page 3 of 4
WP No.383 of 2023
C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
Svn
WP 383 of 2023
11-06-2024
Page 4 of 4
R.Sankarasubbu
G.Paventhan
The Teller Committee, Represented by its Chairman, Madras High Court Advocates Association
The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, Represented by its Secretary
S.M. Subramaniam
C. Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
