A writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a writ of Mandamus direct the respondent bank to return the original title deed. Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, resulting in its dismissal.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.35973 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.03.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.35973 of 2023
P.Radhakrishnan .. Petitioner
Vs.
State Bank of India (Previously State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur) Rep. by its Chief Manager Oppanakara Street Coimbatore 641 001.
.. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to return the original title deed executed as a registered sale deed document dated 06.02.1982 to petitioner herein P.Radhakrishnan, S/o. A.P.Nair, registered as document No.388 of 1982.
For the Petitioner : Mr.N.Kathiresan
_________ Page 1 of 4_
W.P.No.35973 of 2023
ORDER
(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the
writ petition.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 07.03.2024 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No
kpl
To
The Chief Manager State Bank of India (Previously State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur) Oppanakara Street Coimbatore 641 001.
Page 2 of 4
W.P.No.35973 of 2023
_________ Page 3 of 4_
W.P.No.35973 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
(kpl)
W.P.No.35973 of 2023
07.03.2024
_________ Page 4 of 4_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Radhakrishnan
State Bank of India
Sanjay V. Gangapurwala
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
