Disposed

Mr.a.P.K.Vadivel v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC16 Dec 2024WP/35862/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the withdrawal of a government grant for training students. The court held that since the respondents had already considered the petitioner's representation via an order dated 13.12.2024, a writ petition is not maintainable, and the petition is disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; liberty granted to challenge the adverse order dated 13.12.2024 in appropriate manner.

Mr.a.P.K.Vadivel Vs the Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 16.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

W.P.No.35862 of 2024

¶7

M/s.Sree Garments Rep. by its Proprietor A.P.K.Vadivel No.27/4, Kammalar Street, Kilsirupakkam Village and Post, Thandarampattu Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District – 606 707

¶8

.. Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Industries and Commerce, (Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises Department) Government of Tamil Nadu, Namakkal Kavignar Maaligai, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Skill Development Corporation, Department of Employment and Training, 8^th Floor, Chennai Metro Rail Limited Building (Chennai Metros) No.327, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. .. Respondents

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

¶14

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.10.2024 and to release the balance amount of Rs.5,64,000/-.

¶15

For Petitioner .. Mr.N.Kumar Rajan For R1 .. Mr.N.Naveen Kumar, Govt. Advocate

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Mandamus seeking a direction to the respondents to examine the representation given by the petitioner and to release the balance amount of Rs.5,64,000/-.

¶18

2.In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it had been stated that the petitioner is running a small garments centre, registered with MSME. On the basis of the registration, the petitioner had been recognized by the Tamil Nadu Skill Development Corporation to give training to the students. The Government extends grant to the petitioner, and in turn the petitioner is expected to forward that particular grant to the students.

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

¶21

3.On the date of inspection, there were no students available as

¶22

declared by the petitioner. It is under those circumstances that the grant was withdrawn. The petitioner had given a representation seeking to restore the grant. That representation had been considered by an order dated 13.12.2024 by the respondents. Since the representation has been considered, it would only be appropriate that the petitioner challenges that order if it is adverse to them in appropriate manner, but a Mandamus would no longer lie. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of granting that liberty to the petitioner. No costs.

¶23

16.12.2024

¶24

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No smv

¶25

¶26

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

¶29

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

smv

W.P.No.35862 of 2024

16.12.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mr.a.P.K.Vadivel v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.a.P.K.Vadivel v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Devi Vs the District collector

Indira Ramasami Vs the Commioner for Milk

M/s.Sun Motors Vs M/s.Ashok Leyland Ltd.

K.Loganathan Vs Deputy Registrar of

P.Chakravarthy Vs The Commissioner

Mahalakshmi Vs the Secretary