Allowed

Andal v. the District Collector

Madras HC16 Feb 2024WP/3581/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a single-paragraph order in a writ petition under Article 226. The Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to issue notice to parties and pass orders on the petitioner's representation within 8 weeks. Petition allowed.

What did the court decide?

Mandamus issued to R3 to issue notice to petitioner and private respondents R5-R8 and pass orders on the representation dated 26.12.2023 within 8 weeks.

Andal Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

2024:MHC:6418

¶2

W.P.No.3581 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED: 16.02.2024

¶5

CORAM :

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶7

W.P.No.3581 of 2024

Andal

.. Petitioner

1.The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶12

The District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶13

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Arur, Dharmapuri District.

¶14

The Tahsildar, Pappirettipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶15

Thulasi

¶16

Radha

¶17

Menaka

¶18

Sekar

¶19

.. Respondents

¶20

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

1/4

¶23

W.P.No.3581 of 2024

¶24

consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2023 and pass suitable orders.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Gnana Banu

¶26

For Respondents : Mr.S.John J. Raja Singh Additional Government Pleader – R1 to R4

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Mr.S.John J.Raja Singh, learned Additional Government Pleader

¶29

accepts notice for R1 to R4 and is armed with instructions to enable a purposeful adjudication of this Writ Petition, even at the stage of admission. No notice is thought necessary to the private respondents, arrayed as R5 to R8, in light of the order proposed to be passed protecting their interests as well.

¶30

The petitioner seeks a mandamus simplicitor directing the Revenue Divisional Officer, Arur/R3 to consider her representation dated 26.12.2023.

¶31

Mr.John would accede to the position that the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2023 is, indeed, pending before R3 and has no objection to the issuance of mandamus directing disposal of representation dated 26.12.2023.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

2/4

¶34

W.P.No.3581 of 2024

¶35

Hence, mandamus is issued to R3 to issue notice to the

¶36

petitioner as well as the private respondents, arrayed as R5 to R8, hear them and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2023 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶37

This Writ Petition is disposed as above. No costs.

¶38

16.02.2024

¶39

Index:Yes/No speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes sl

¶40

¶41

1.The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶42

The District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶43

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Arur, Dharmapuri District.

¶44

The Tahsildar, Pappirettipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

3/4

¶47

W.P.No.3581 of 2024

¶48

DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.

¶49

¶50

W.P.No.3581 of 2024

¶51

16.02.2024

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

4/4

Andal v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Andal v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Ibrahim Vs The Assistant Executive Engineer

P.Geethanjali Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Mrs.Sangeetha Somu Vs the Regional Passport Officer

M/S.Pavan Doors and Windows India Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade

Medisales India Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Tamilnadu

Vasuki Vs the District Society Registrar