Dismissed

Ssl Ttk Limited v. State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC4 Nov 2024WP/34701/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking mandamus to register an imported Ducati motorcycle without insisting on entry tax was withdrawn by the petitioner at the stage of final hearing. The court granted liberty to pursue other available remedies and dismissed the petition and connected miscellaneous petition as withdrawn, with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and M.P.No.1 of 2006 dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies; no costs.

Ssl Ttk Limited Vs State of Tamilnadu — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

2024:MHC:3708

¶2

W.P.No.34701 of 2006

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED: 04.11.2024

¶5

CORAM :

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶7

and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN

¶8

W.P.No.34701of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006

¶9

SSL-TTK Limited

¶10

rep. by its Company Accounts Manager R.Krishnan FAC:Plot No.F-73, Sipcot Industrial Park Irunkattukottai - Sriperumpudur Tk Kancheepuram Dist.

¶11

.. Petitioner

¶12

¶13

1.State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Tax Department,

¶14

Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶15

2.Commercial Tax Officer, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 026.

¶16

3.The Asst. Registering Authority/ Regional Transport Officer, Kancheepuram.

¶17

.. Respondents

¶18

PRAYER: PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent, the Regional Transport Officer, Kancheepuram to register the imported Motor Cycle G.T.1000 Model 2007 made by DUCATI ZDM1WABP 27-B 005321 in Ducati North America INC in the name of the petitioner company without insisting on entry tax.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.L.Sudarsanam For Respondents : Mr.G.Nanmaran Special Government Pleader

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P.No.34701 of 2006

¶22

DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J. and G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mr.Sudarsanam, learned counsel on record for the petitioner states

¶25

that the petitioner wishes to withdraw this Writ Petition. He seeks liberty

¶26

to take recourse to such other remedies as may be available.

¶27

Granting such liberty and based on the endorsement made by

¶28

learned counsel on record for the petitioner, this Writ Petition and the

¶29

connected Miscellaneous Petition are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

¶30

[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J]

¶31

sl 04.11.2024 Index:Yes/No Speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes

¶32

To 1.State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Tax Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.Commercial Tax Officer, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 026. 3.The Asst. Registering Authority/ Regional Transport Officer, Kancheepuram.

¶33

W.P.No.34701of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ssl Ttk Limited v. State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ssl Ttk Limited v. State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nemichand Desarlla Vs the Commissioner of Customs

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Karnataka Castings

Union of India Vs Achutha Gomathi Mes No 189946

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Teledata Informatics Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Mr.S.Balamurali

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Nms Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.