Allowed

D.Subramaniyan, v. The Principal Secretary

Madras HC4 Dec 2024WP/34537/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition challenged an order dated 28.09.2015 under Article 226. The court, relying on a co-ordinate bench order from 06.03.2024 concerning similar issues, quashed the impugned order and allowed the writ petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 28.09.2015 passed by the third respondent is quashed; the writ petition is allowed; no order as to cost.

D.Subramaniyan, Vs The Principal Secretary — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P. No.34537 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 04.12.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.34537 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.2 & 3 of 2015

D.Subramaniyan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Higher Education Department, Fort St. George,

¶11

Chennai- 600 009

¶12

2.The Commissioner of Technical Education, Guindy

¶13

Chennai- 600 025

¶14

3.The Principal P.T.Lee. C.No.Polytechnic College, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007

¶15

4.The Chairman Governing Council P.T.Lee. C.No.Polytechnic College, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

Page No.1 of 5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P. No.34537 of 2015

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with the impugned order No.917/A3/2010 dated 28.09.2015 on the file of the 3^rd respondent and to quash the same, and direct the 3^rd respondent to follow his own order No.917/A3/2010 dated 06.03.2015.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Subramanian Party-in-person For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.E.Manoharan, for R3 & R4

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 submitted that the similar issue that arise for consideration in the present writ petition has been considered by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7135 of 2020 and Batch which was disposed of by an order dated 06.03.2024 and the said order was though appealed against in W.A.No.3093 of 2024 the same is pending, but no stay was granted. In the light of the said order dated 06.03.2024 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench, the impugned order is also liable to be quashed.

¶24

Page No.2 of 5

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P. No.34537 of 2015

¶27

the 3 rd

¶28

2.In the circumstances, the impugned order dated 28.09.2015 passed by

¶29

the 3^rd respondent is quashed and accordingly the writ petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

04.12.2024

¶31

vsn Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No

¶32

Page No.3 of 5

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P. No.34537 of 2015

¶35

¶36

1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Higher Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009

¶37

2.The Commissioner of Technical Education, Guindy Chennai- 600 025

¶38

3.The Principal P.T.Lee. C.No.Polytechnic College, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007

¶39

4.The Chairman Governing Council P.T.Lee. C.No.Polytechnic College, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007

¶40

Page No.4 of 5

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P. No.34537 of 2015

¶43

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J.

¶44

vsn

¶45

W.P.No.34537 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.2 & 3 of 2015

¶46

04.12.2024

¶47

Page No.5 of 5

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

D.Subramaniyan, v. The Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Subramaniyan, v. The Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Bala Singaravelan Vs the Secretary to Government

C.Varalakshmi Vs The General Manager

C.Varalakshmi Vs The General Manager

A.Ram Mohan Vs State of Tamil Nadu

M.M.Acharya Vs The Union of India

Dr.R.Thiagarajan Vs Tamil Nadu Veterinary & Animal