Writ petition seeking mandamus for removal of unauthorized encroachment and action against the encroacher was disposed of on the basis of a communication from the Tahsildar confirming that all encroachments have been removed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No.34051 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05-12-2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P. NO.34051 OF 2024
P. JAGATHEESH PETITIONER
vs.
Page 1 of 4
W.P. No.34051 of 2024
7. THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 50,KOLAPPALUR VILLAGE SIRUVALUR INNER CIRCLE GOBICHETTIPALAYAM, ERODE DISTRICT
9. N. SUBRAMANIYAN RESPONDENTS
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 29.07.2024 and 22.08.2024 and accordingly, direct the official respondents to take action against the ninth respondent which was made by the unauthorised encroachment in S.F. No.671 and Natham Pula. Nos.779-2 respectively in accordance with the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2015 (6) CTC 369 within a stipulated time.
For petitioner Ms. A. Pramila For RR 1 to 7 Mr. A. Edwin Prabakar State Government Pleader assisted by Mr. Karthik Jaganath Government Advocate For R8 Mr. E. Raj Thilak
ORDER
(made by the Hon'ble The Chief Justice)
Mr. Prabakar tenders a communication dated 27.11.2024 from the Tahsildar (respondent no.4) to the Government Pleader's office in which it is stated that all encroachments have been removed. A copy of the
Page 2 of 4
W.P. No.34051 of 2024
communication, with enclosures, is given to the petitioner's counsel. The same
is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. In view of what is stated
in the communication, which is accepted as a statement made to the Court, petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.) 05-12-2024
Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No
cad
To:
CHENNAI -600 009
Page 3 of 4
W.P. No.34051 of 2024
GOBICHETTIPALAYAM ERODE DISTRICT -638 456
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
cad
W.P. No.34051 of 2024
05.12.2024
Page 4 of 4
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
2015 (6) CTC 369Referred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. JAGATHEESH
STATE OF TAMIL NADU
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
THE TAHSILDAR
N. SUBRAMANIYAN
K.R. SHRIRAM
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
