Disposed

Dr.Sudhir Raj Aravindran v. the Commissioner

Madras HC10 Dec 2024WP/33933/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction to the Chennai Corporation to dispose of a representation regarding inspection of a dilapidated house and de-occupation by occupants. The court noted an inspection report confirming structural damage and a missing concern notice issued to the residents. The petition was disposed of after general directions were issued for compliance within four weeks of an app

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to take necessary steps within four weeks of an application being filed to serve a caution notice and deal with the dilapidated structure.

Dr.Sudhir Raj Aravindran Vs the Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.33933 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 10.12.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

Writ Petition No.33933 of 2024

¶7

Dr.Sudhir Raja Ravindran …. Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Park Town, Rippon Building Chennai-600 003.

¶10

2.Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-13 (Adyar) No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai Adyar, Chennai 600 020.

¶11

3.The Asst. Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-13 (Adyar) No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai Adyar, Chennai 600 020.

¶12

4.The Asst. Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-13 (Adyar) No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai Adyar, Chennai 600 020.

¶13

1 / 6

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.33933 of 2024

5.R.Sridhar

6.Ms.Shanthi

.. Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to dispose of the representation dated 04.10.2024 submitted for inspection of the house property bearing Door No.132, Velachery Main road, Venkatapuram, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015 and pass necessary orders for de-occupation of the property by the 5^th and 6^th respondents.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.L.Dhamodharan

¶21

For Respondent : Mr.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel for R1 to R4

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Mandamus, seeking a direction against the respondents 1 to 4, to dispose of the representation dated 04.10.2024, which representation was given to inspect the house property at

¶24

Door No.132, Velachery Main Road, Venkatapuram, Saidapet at

¶25

Chennai 600 015.

¶26

2.In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it had been stated that

¶27

the writ petitioner is a co-owner of the aforementioned property which was

¶28

2 / 6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.33933 of 2024

¶31

originally owned and possessed by his father. His father died on 08.10.2015. Apart from the petitioner, there are four others who had also inherited the property. It is contended that the property is in a dilapidated condition but the 5^th and 6^th respondents continued to occupy the same.

¶32

3.The petitioner had also filed O.S.No.4099 of 2018 before the XVIII Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai, seeking vacant possession of the property. It is stated that the suit is pending. Claiming that the property is in a dilapidated condition and that the petitioner had given a representation on 04.10.2024, seeking inspection of the property, the writ petition has been filed. Pending the Writ Petition, a direction was issued to the 2^nd respondent to make a personal inspection of the building. An inspection had been conducted and the following report had been filed:

¶33

“ 6.I respectfully submit that the said premises have been inspected by the officials of the Greater Chennai Corporation on 04.12.2024 and found that there were many cracks and exposed reinforcements with rust and bulge at various structural members, it is also observed that in some place the ceiling were very badly damaged and some columns caused settlement.

¶34

7.I respectfully submit that based on Inspection Notice under Section 136 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 vide

¶35

3 / 6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.No.33933 of 2024

¶38

Z.O.XII/Dil/Dn 169/5759/2024 dated 05/12/2024 was served for the dangerous condition of the dilapidated building at Door No.132, Velachery Main Road, Venkatapuram, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. Further it was instructed either to fence off or take down or secure as repair the above mentioned structure so as to prevent any damage from the building.

¶39

8.I respectfully submit that the said premises have already been under lock and found that there are no tenants occupied inside the premises. Therefore the petitioner is advised to make an application for the demolished of the building to the Greater Chennai Corporation for demolishing the said dilapidated building. ”

¶40

4.In the report, it is clearly stated that there are cracks and exposed reinforcements with rush and bulge at various structural members. It had also been observed that in some places the ceiling was very badly damaged and some columns caused settlement. But, however the petitioner is just one five among other co-owners of the building and if all of them file applications or if any of them file application with no objection from the others then the respondent must proceed further in the manner known to law.

¶41

5.It is noted that notice issued to R5 & R6 had returned 'unclaimed'. But in

¶42

the report of the 2^nd respondent, it had been clearly stated that there are no

¶43

4 / 6

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.No.33933 of 2024

¶46

occupants in the said building. From the date on which a proper application is filed, respondents must take necessary steps within a period of four weeks from that date to comply with that application.

¶47

6.The Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶48

10.12.2024

¶49

Index : Yes/No NCS : Yes/No KP

¶50

¶51

1.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Park Town, Rippon Building Chennai-600 003.

¶52

2.Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-13 (Adyar) No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai Adyar, Chennai 600 020.

¶53

3.The Assit. Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-13 (Adyar) No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai Adyar, Chennai 600 020.

¶54

5 / 6

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

W.P.No.33933 of 2024

¶57

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.,J

¶58

¶59

4.The Asst. Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-13 (Adyar) No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai Adyar, Chennai 600 020.

¶60

Writ Petition No.33933 of 2024

¶61

10.12.2024

¶62

6 / 6

¶63

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Dr.Sudhir Raj Aravindran v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Sudhir Raj Aravindran v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Sriramalu,shop No.T/H-1 Vs The Chief Executive officer

Ms. Thillai Lokanathan Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Mahavir Plantations Pvt. Ltd. Vs The District Collector

Kannadas Vs the Chief Director

Dayalal D.Patel Vs The District Collector

S.S.Natarajan and Co, Vs The Registrar of Cooperative Societies