Dismissed

B,Raghupathy v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Jun 2024WP/33858/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a recruitment notification for JTO posts was disposed of after the petitioners' counsel obtained permission to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

B,Raghupathy Vs Government of Tamil Nadu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.33858 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

¶6

W.P.No.33858 of 2016

¶7

and

¶8

W.M.P.Nos.29186 and 29187 of 2016 and 31383 of 2018

¶9

B.Raghupathy

¶10

B.Radhakrishnan

¶11

... Petitioners

¶12

Vs.

¶13

Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep by Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

¶14

The Commissioner / Director of Employment and Training, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

¶15

The Joint Director (Craftsman Training), Directorate of Employment and Training, Training Wing, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 ... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 3^rd respondent relating to the notification dated 12.01.2016 published in the Tamil Daily News Paper Thina Thanthi DIPR/59/DIS/2016 for direct recruitment to the post of JTO in the Government I.T.I for 2014-

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.No.33858 of 2016

¶20

2015 to quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondents to issue fresh notification prescribing diploma qualification alone for the past and to conduct screening test in diploma course syllabus level.

¶21

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Dhanasekar For Respondents : Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan

¶22

Additional Government Pleader

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks

¶25

permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶26

In view of the submission and also the endorsement made by the

¶27

learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶28

07.06.2024

¶29

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes / No srn

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/4

W.P.No.33858 of 2016

The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu Labour and Employment Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

¶35

The Commissioner / Director of Employment and Training, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

¶36

The Joint Director (Craftsman Training), Directorate of Employment and Training, Training Wing, Guindy, Chennai 600 032

¶37

3/4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.33858 of 2016

P.T. ASHA, J,

srn

W.P.No.33858 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.29186 and 29187 of 2016 and 31383 of 2018

¶43

07.06.2024

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

4/4

B,Raghupathy v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B,Raghupathy v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Gopalan Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

V.Muthusamy, Vs Government of Tamilnadu

Smt.M.Parvathy(Deceased), Vs The Secretary to Government

R.Gopi Vs The Presiding Officer

Mrs.Kalavathy Vs The District Collector

G.Kanagasabai (Deceased) Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu