Disposed

Sathish v. the District Collector

Madras HC21 Mar 2024WP/3244/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A father challenged the unreasoned rejection of online applications for Ganjam Reddy Backward Class community certificates for his son and daughter. Relying on an earlier batch decision, the Court set aside the impugned order, remanded the applications to the District Awareness Committee headed by the District Collector, Namakkal, with directions to decide per G.O.Ms.No.541 after due opportunity.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; application remanded to first respondent/District Awareness Committee to decide afresh within twelve weeks post-elections.

Sathish Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.3244 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 21.03.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶7

W.P.No.3244 of 2024

¶8

Sathish

¶9

S/o Subramaniam .. Petitioner

¶10

¶11

The District Collector Namakkal District Namakkal

¶12

The Welfare Officer District Backward and Minority Welfare Department Namakkal District

¶13

The Tahsildar Mohanur Taluk Namakkal District

¶14

The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Mohanur Taluk Namakkal District

¶15

.. Respondents

¶16

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

¶17

Page 1 of 6

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.No.3244 of 2024

¶20

praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order of the 3^rd and 4^th respondents vide application no.TN-5202308308449 and TN-5202308308471 dated 30.08.2023 and quash the same and consequently directing the 3^rd and 4^th respondents to issue the community certificate of Backward Community – Ganjam Reddy to petitioner's son Tamil and daughter Thanvika Sri.

¶21

For Petitioner :: Mr.R.Balaguruswamy For Respondents :: Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi Special Government Pleader

¶22

ORDER

¶23

(Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR,J.)

¶24

This writ petition is filed challenging the order passed by the respondents 3 and 4, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner through online for issuance of community certificate of Backward Community – Ganjam Reddy to the petitioner's children by merely updating a remark that action will be taken based on the report of the district awareness committee.

¶25

The case of the petitioner is that he belongs to Ganjam ReddyBackward Class community. The petitioner earlier had applied for issuance of community certificate for Backward Community – Ganjam Reddy to his son and daughter. However, by the impugned order, the application filed by

¶26

Page 2 of 6

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No.3244 of 2024

¶29

the petitioner was rejected without even assigning any reason. The reasons

¶30

stated in the impugned reads as follows:-

¶31

“Application Rejected. Action will be taken based on the report of the District Awareness Committee.”

¶32

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has obtained bona fide certificates from the school and also produced the certificates issued to the petitioner's relatives. It is in the said circumstances, the learned counsel for petitioner has produced before this Court the order passed by this Court in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.Nos.1101, 1105, 1109, 1111, 1114 of 2024 dated 06.03.2024 (Sarathkumar and others v. The District Collector, Namakkal and others), wherein this Court, after referring to G.O.Ms.No.541, Social Welfare Department dated 24.07.1981, quashed the order impugned therein and directed the respondents to pass orders afresh on the basis of the Government Order and after giving adequate opportunity.

¶33

Having regard to the factual averments made in the affidavit filed

¶34

in support of the writ petition and the stand taken by the respondents in the

¶35

Page 3 of 6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.No.3244 of 2024

¶38

counter affidavit that the District Awareness Committee headed by the District Collector, Namakkal is required to pass orders, the impugned order without assigning any reason is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the first respondent to process the application of the petitioner. The District Awareness Committee headed by the District Collector, Namakkal District shall consider the application of the petitioner for issuance of Ganjam Reddy-Backward Class community certificate to the petitioner's son and daughter on the basis of valid documents submitted by the petitioner and on the basis of the guidelines issued in the Government Order aforesaid, and shall pass appropriate orders, after giving adequate opportunity to the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of completion of the ensuing election process. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Consequently, W.M.P.No.3512 of 2024 is closed. No order as to costs.

¶39

Index : yes/no (S.S.S.R.,J.) (N.S.,J.) Neutral citation : yes/no 21.03.2024

¶40

¶41

_____________ Page 4 of 6_

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P.No.3244 of 2024

¶44

¶45

The District Collector Namakkal District Namakkal

¶46

The Welfare Officer District Backward and Minority Welfare Department Namakkal District

¶47

The Tahsildar Mohanur Taluk Namakkal District

¶48

The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Mohanur Taluk Namakkal District

¶49

Page 5 of 6

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

W.P.No.3244 of 2024

S.S.SUNDAR,J. AND

N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.

W.P.No.3244 of 2024

21.03.2024

_____________ Page 6 of 6_

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sathish v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathish v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anjali Iyer Vs The Director of Town and Country Planning

Tvl .Sree Rajendra Steels Vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)(Fac)

Bala N.Vinoth Kumar Vs the Commissioner

S.Palthai Vs The Chairman

M/s.Arun Packaged Drinking Water Vs The Chairman

M.S.Sakthivel Vs the Revenue Division Officer