Disposed

M/S.Thriveni Earth Movers Pvt.Ltd v. the Commissioner of Geology and Mining

Madras HC26 Mar 2024WP/32017/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the petitioner to appear before the second respondent on 03.04.2024 for the enquiry regarding the renewal of Environmental Clearance for their mining plan. The court ordered the respondents to pass appropriate orders within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner directed to appear before the second respondent on 03.04.2024; respondents to consider the application and pass orders within two weeks.

M/S.Thriveni Earth Movers Pvt.Ltd Vs the… — Mining and Natural Resources | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 26.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶7

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶8

M/s.Thriveni Earth Movers Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Authorized Signatory, SPR. Venkataachalam, No.22/110, Greenways Road, Fairlands, Salem – 636 106. ...Petitioner in both cases vs.

¶9

1.The Commissioner of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

¶10

2.The State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Rep. by its Member Secretary, 3 rd Floor, Panagal Maligai, No.1, Jeenis Road, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

¶11

3.Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Rep. by its Member Secretary, No.76, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

¶12

4.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 5.The Deputy Director,

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/7

¶15

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶16

Geology and Mining, Krishnagiri District. ...Respondents in both cases

¶17

Prayer in W.P.No.32017/2023 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned communication of the 1 st respondent dated 19.05.2023 vide Rc.No.3487/MM1/2023 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents 1 and 5 to accept the seigniorage fees and to issue transport permit for transporting rough stone for the approved quantity as per the mining plan dated 17.02.2021 approved by the 5 th respondent pertaining to the petitioner's quarry situate in Kamandoddi Village, Soolagiri Taluk (previously in Hosur Taluk), Krishnagiri District, comprised in S.No.665 (Part-1), based on the renewal of consent order dated 09.05.2023 issued by the 3 rd respondent in the light of S.O.221(E) dated 18.01.2021 and S.O.1807 (E) dated 12.04.2022 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi by considering the petitioner's representation dated 31.05.2023.

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

2/7

¶20

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶21

Prayer in W.P.No.32022/2023 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of

¶22

Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call

¶23

for the records relating to the impugned communication of the 1 st respondent dated 19.05.2023 vide Rc.No.3488/MM1/2023 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents 1 and 5 to accept the seigniorage fees and to issue transport permit for transporting rough stone for the approved quantity as per the mining plan dated 17.02.2021 approved by the 5 th respondent pertaining to the petitioner's quarry situate in Kamandoddi Village, Soolagiri Taluk (previously in Hosur Taluk), Krishnagiri District, comprised in S.No.665 (Part-2), based on the renewal of consent order dated 09.05.2023 issued by the 3 rd respondent in the light of S.O.221(E) dated 18.01.2021 and S.O.1807 (E) dated 12.04.2022 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi by considering the petitioner's representation dated 31.05.2023.

¶24

For Petitioner in both cases : Mr. Iyyadurai, Senior Advocate

¶25

For Respondents in both cases : Mr.P.Kumaresan, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.J. Daniel for R1, R4 & R5 Mr. Venkatesan Babu, CGSC for R2 Mrs. Shanmugavalli for R3 Standing Counsel

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

3/7

¶28

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶29

COMMON ORDER

¶30

(Order of the Court was made by S.S.Sunda r, J.)

¶31

The learned Additional Advocate General was earlier directed to report as to the decision taken on the application submitted by the petitioner seeking renewal of Environmental Clearance.

¶32

2.Today, the learned Additional Advocate General reports that the application will be processed only if the petitioner appears and participates in the enquiry.

¶33

3.When the submission of application is admitted, the respondents ought to have issued notice calling upon the petitioner to appear if they want any clarification.

¶34

4.In view of the stand taken by the learned Additional Advocate General, the petitioner is directed to appear before the second respondent on 03.04.2024. On that date, the petitioner shall be heard and the respondents shall consider the application, in the light of Official Memorandum dated 13.12.2022 and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks thereafter.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

4/7

¶37

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶38

5.With the aforesaid directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶39

costs.

¶40

(S.S.S.R.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 26.03.2024

¶41

Index: yes/no Speaking order:yes/no Neutral Citation:yes/no pam

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

5/7

¶44

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶45

¶46

1.The Commissioner of Geology and Mining, Guindy,

¶47

Chennai – 600 032.

¶48

2.The Member Secretary, State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, 3 rd Floor, Panagal Maligai, No.1, Jeenis Road, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

¶49

3.The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, No.76, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

¶50

4.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶51

5.The Deputy Director, Geology and Mining, Krishnagiri District.

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

6/7

¶54

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶55

S.S.SUNDAR, J. and N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

¶56

Pam

¶57

W.P.Nos.32017 & 32022 of 2023

¶58

26.03.2024

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶60

7/7

M/S.Thriveni Earth Movers Pvt.Ltd v. the Commissioner of Geology and Mining

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Thriveni Earth Movers Pvt.Ltd v. the Commissioner of Geology and Mining

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Padmavathy Vs the Member Secretary - Cmda

Mrs.Manjula Vs R.Amudha

A.Ahmed Moideen Vs the Commissioner

M.B.Ravindran Vs Member Secretary

M.B.Ravindran Vs Member Secretary

S.Velladurai Vs Muniandi