Disposed

Adikesavan.G v. the Tahsildar

Madras HC17 Oct 2024WP/30454/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking direction to Tahsildar to consider representation for inclusion of all legal heirs in land patta. Court directed respondent to consider representation and pass final order within 8 weeks after hearing interested parties, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondent to consider representation dated 21.12.2023 and pass final order within 8 weeks.

Adikesavan.G Vs the Tahsildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P No.30454 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P No.30454 of 2024

¶7

Adikesvan G 2. Gnanapragesh G 3. A.G.Jayachandran ..Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Tahsildar, Katpadi ...Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the letter dated 21.12.2023 filed by the 2^nd petitioner.

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Edison Gnanaraj For Respondent : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

1/4

W.P No.30454 of 2024

O R D E R

The petitioners herein seek a direction to the respondent to

¶17

consider their representation dated 21.12.2023 seeking inclusion of the names of all legal heirs of the petitioners' father in the patta for the property situated in S.No.107/9 at Kammavarpuram Village, Karigiri, Vellore District.

¶18

2. It is the case of the petitioners that the above mentioned property originally belonged to their father and after his death, the names of his legal heirs have not been included in the patta. However, the name of the petitioners' brother's son namely Saravanan alone was included in the patta leaving the names of other legal heirs. Therefore, the petitioners submitted a representation on 21.12.2023 seeking inclusion of the names of all the legal heirs of the petitioners' father and the said representation has not been considered till date. Hence, the petitioners are before this Court.

¶19

3. Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader, who

¶20

takes notice for the respondent would submit that the representation of the petitioner will be considered, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶22

W.P No.30454 of 2024

¶23

4. In view of the same, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 21.12.2023 and pass final order, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after giving opportunity to the petitioners and other interested parties.

¶24

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶25

costs.

¶26

17.10.2024 (½)

¶27

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order dna To

¶28

The Tahsildar, Katpadi

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

W.P No.30454 of 2024

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dna

W.P No.30454 of 2024 (½)

¶34

17.10.2024

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Adikesavan.G v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adikesavan.G v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Anbarasu Vs the District Collector

Sathyashree Vs the Inspector General of Registration

E.Kesavan Vs the Collector

M.Rajasekar Vs the Sub-Registrar

J.Balakrishnan Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

Residents of Rajapillai Thottam Vs the Secretary Government of Tamilnadu