Dismissed

P.Ramkumar, v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC19 Jan 2024WP/30355/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for and quash the selection list for Grade II Police Constable under Sports Quota for Schedule Caste. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's submission.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

P.Ramkumar, Vs the Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.30355 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 19.01.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

W.P.No.30355 of 2012 and MP.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012

¶7

P. Ram Kumar ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Department of Homes Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶10

The Director General of Police Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

¶11

The Director General of Police & Chairman Tamil Nadu Uniform Services Recruitment Board No.807, 2^nd floor,

¶12

P.T.Lee Chengalvaraya Naicker Building, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. … Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Cetiorarified Mandamus to call for the selection list of the 3^rd respondent of the year 2012 and quash the same in so far as the non selection of the petitioner under Sports Quota for the post of Grade II Police Constable reserved for Schedule Caste and consequently directing the 3^rd respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for the post

¶14

Page No.1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.30355 of 2012

¶17

of Grade II Police Constable under reserved category and appoint the petitioner as Grade II Police Constable.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mrs.P.Vijaya Devi Government Advocate for R1 Mr.P.Kumaresan Additional Advocate General Asst.by Mrs.D.Sowmi Dattan for R2 & R3

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has now become infructuous and nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶21

In view of the endorsement and the submission made by the learned

¶22

counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stand dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are also also closed.

¶23

19.01.2024 dpq Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No

¶24

Page No.2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No.30355 of 2012

¶27

To:

¶28

The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Department of Homes Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶29

The Director General of Police Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

¶30

The Director General of Police & Chairman Tamil Nadu Uniform Services Recruitment Board No.807, 2^nd floor, P.T.Lee Chengalvaraya Naicker Building, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶31

Page No.3 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.No.30355 of 2012

¶34

J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶35

dpq

¶36

W.P. No.30355 of 2012

¶37

19.01.2024

¶38

Page No.4 of 4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Ramkumar, v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Ramkumar, v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Shanmugam Vs the Secretary to Govt.

K.Geethanjali, Vs the Principal

The Assistant Teachers Assn., Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Mrs.M.Jayalakshmi, Vs Union Territory of Pondicherry

J.Ponrosiba Vs Government of Tamilnadu

P.Arunachalam, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu