Writ petition challenging dismissal orders and seeking reinstatement with suspension-period benefits was withdrawn by the petitioner in view of subsequent developments; the court permitted the withdrawal and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No. 29909 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
W.P.No. 29909 of 2018 and W.M.P.No. 34913 of 2018
E. Sarasa
... Petitioner
Vs.
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent relating to the orders in P.N. No.2067/A2/2016, dated 25.07.2018 quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the first respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with consequential benefits regularization of suspension period as duty and for consequential monetary benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr. K. Govindaraj For Respondents : Mr. R.S. Selvam, Government Advocate
1/3
W.P.No. 29909 of 2018
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw this writ petition in
view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this writ
petition. Permission is granted.
06.03.2024
Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No
AT
To
2/3
W.P.No. 29909 of 2018
BATTU DEVANAND, J.
AT
W.P.No. 29909 of 2018 and W.M.P.No. 34913 of 2018
06.03.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
E. Sarasa
The Director and Project Director, Integrated Child Development Project, Tharamani, Chennai
The District Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Chennai
The Child Development Project Officer, Scheme-6, Chennai
Battu Devanand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
