Writ petition challenging pay fixation and pension orders; Government Advocate submitted pay had been revised making the prayer infructuous. Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.29888 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 24.07.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
W.P.No. 29888 of 2015 &
M.P.No. 1 of 2015
K.Karunanidhi ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Director of Local Fund Audit, Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 108.
2.The Assistant Director, O/o.The Director of Local Fund Audit, Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 108. ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Certiorarified to call for the records relating to the orders in (1) Letter Mu.Mu.No.62924/P.U.P.4(05)/2010 dated 09.01.2011 and (2)
1/6
W.P.No.29888 of 2015
Ni.Mu.No.PUP (V) 5/21243/11 dated 13.12.2011 (PPO No.27417/P) of the Second Respondent, quash the order dated 09.01.2011 to the limited extent of directions to refix the pay of the petitioner with reference to G.O.Ms.No.6, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (E5) Department dated 22.01.2009, and to quash the order dated 13.12.2011 to the limited extent of fixation of Pension on the basis of last pay drawn as Rs.13,860/- and issue consequential directions to the Respondent (1) to refix the pensionary benefits on the basis of last pay drawn as Rs.15380/- which he was last drawing (2) to take into account the half of the services of the petitioner from 04.02.1975 to 30.09.1983 on daily wage basis, along with regular service from 01.01.1983 to 30.06.2010, for reckoning the total qualifying service for pension (3) to refund the amount recovered from DCRG towards excess pay (4) to consequently revise the pensionary benefits of the petitioner on that basis and (5) disburse consequential monetary benefits with 12% compound interest per annum, all within a time frame
2/6
W.P.No.29888 of 2015
For Petitioner : Mr. M.Ravi
For Respondents : Mr. P.Ganesan Government Advocate.
O R D E R
The learned Government Advocate has submitted that the petitioner's pay has been revised and consequently the prayer has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
24.07.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan
3/6
W.P.No.29888 of 2015
To
1.The Director of Local Fund Audit, Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 108.
2.The Assistant Director, O/o.The Director of Local Fund Audit, Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 108.
4/6
W.P.No.29888 of 2015
P.T. ASHA, J,
kan
W.P.No. 29888 of 2015
5/6
W.P.No.29888 of 2015
24.07.2024
6/6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Karunanidhi
The Director of Local Fund Audit, Kuralagam, Chennai - 600 108
The Assistant Director, O/o.The Director of Local Fund Audit, Kuralagam, Chennai - 600 108
P.T. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
