Dismissed

Builders Association of India v. Employees State Insurance

Madras HC13 Dec 2024WP/29496/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners failed to appear or file representations in their Writ Petition seeking quashing of ESI Corporation press releases regarding coverage of site workers. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, subsequently closing connected miscellaneous petitions without adjudicating the substantive merits.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed. No costs awarded.

Builders Association of India Vs Employees State… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P No.29496 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 13.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL

¶6

W.P.No.29496 of 2015 and MP.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015

¶7

Builders Association of India Coimbatore Centre, Rep. by its Secretary Mr.K.Rajavel

¶8

.. Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

Employees State Insurance Corporation, Rep. By Additional Commissioner (Rev). Panchdeep Bhawan, C.I.G. Road, New Delhi – 110 002.

¶11

2.The Regional Director, E.S.I. Corporation, Trichy Road, Coimbatore. .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the Respondents Corporation Press Release stating that the coverage of E.S.I. of the Construction site workers including staff is published on 17.07.2015 – (N0.E-13/12/09/2015/PR), 23.7.2015 (E-13/12/09/2015/PR) & 31.7.2015 – (P-12/11/11/2010 – Rev II) on the file of the 1^st respondent herein and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : No Appearance

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/3

¶16

W.P No.29496 of 2015

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.C.V.Ramachandramurthy for ESI

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned

¶20

counsel for the respondent is present through video conference.

¶21

On 03.12.2024, there was no representation for the

¶22

petitioner, therefore, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner, which shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶23

13.12.2024

¶24

Index: Yes/No. Internet/Yes/No drl

¶25

¶26

Employees State Insurance Corporation, Rep. By Additional Commissioner (Rev). Panchdeep Bhawan, C.I.G. Road, New Delhi – 110 002.

¶27

2.The Regional Director, E.S.I. Corporation, Trichy Road, Coimbatore.

¶28

P.DHANABAL.J.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/3

W.P No.29496 of 2015

drl

W.P.No.29496 of 2015 and MP.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 (½)

¶34

13.12.2024

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/3

Builders Association of India v. Employees State Insurance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Builders Association of India v. Employees State Insurance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Majhi Vs State of Tn

Sonaj S Sabu Vs the State Rep by Its

Madhan Vs the State Rep by Its

The Management of Pentadaewha Vs the Presiding Officer

Munusamy Vs State by Inspector of Police

Thiyagarajan Vs The State by