Writ of certiorari against a Debt Recovery Tribunal order; on the respondent bank's submission that the loan account stood closed and no cause survived, the High Court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.29199 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.29199 of 2004 and
W.M.P.No.35451 of 2004
T.Balan
... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the 1 st respondent in I.A.No.322 of 2002 in O.A.No.329 of 2002 dated 12.05.2003 and quash the same.
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.29199 of 2004
| For Petitioner | : Mrs.V.Pavithra |
|---|---|
| for Mr.V.Srimathi | |
| For R1 | : Tribunal |
| For R2 | : Mr.V.Chandrasekaran |
| For R3 | : No appearance |
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the respondent made a submission that the loan
account has already been closed and therefore, the cause do not exist and consequently, the writ petition has become infructuous.
disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
09.01.2024
veda Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes / No
To
Page 2 of 4
W.P.No.29199 of 2004
1.The Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore.
Page 3 of 4
W.P.No.29199 of 2004
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
veda
W.P.No.29199 of 2004
09.01.2024
Page 4 of 4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.Balan
The Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore
Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank, Dharmapuri Branch, Dharmapuri
M/s.Sri Balaji Food Products, Represented by its partner Mr.Thimmi Chetty
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
