Disposed

A.Roopavathi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC3 Oct 2024WP/28958/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging rejection of patta application was disposed of. Court directed Revenue Divisional Officer to consider pending appeal by petitioner and pass final orders within eight weeks without adjudicating merits of underlying claim.

What did the court decide?

Direction to first respondent to consider appeal filed by petitioner on 29.11.2023 and pass final orders within eight weeks.

A.Roopavathi Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.28958 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P No.28958 of 2024

¶7

A.Roopavathi ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram.

¶10

The Tashildar, Taluk Office, Solinganallur.

¶11

...Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records from second respondent vide Na.Ka.no.5218/2023/A1 dated 01.11.2023 rejection of petitioner's application for re-issuing patta in respect of property which is situated at Old S.F.No.132/7A, (Part New Survey No.132/48, Polt No.298-B, Kubera Nagar, 10th street Kancheepuram District with extent of 2450sq.ft. quash the same consequently direct the first respondent to grant the patta in the name of the petitioner and A.Geetha whose are absolute owners of the

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

1/4

W.P.No.28958 of 2024

property.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanan

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Though the writ petition is filed challenging the order passed by the second respondent rejecting the petitioner's application seeking issuance of patta in respect of the property situated in Old S.F.No.132/7A, (Part New Survey No.132/48, Polt No.298-B, Kubera Nagar, 10th street Kancheepuram District and seeking a direction to the first respondent to grant patta in the name of the petitioner and A.Geetha, at the time of argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that challenging the impugned order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent and she would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to the first respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by her.

¶21

The statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is recorded.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶23

W.P.No.28958 of 2024

¶24

Even as per the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the

¶25

writ petition, the petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent on 29.11.2023 challenging the impugned order dated 01.11.2023 and the same is pending without any progress.

¶26

Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents would submit that the appeal of the petitioner would be considered on its own merits and appropriate orders will be passed.

¶27

In view of the above submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the first respondent to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 29.11.2023 and pass final orders, after issuing notice to all the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶29

03.10.2024

¶30

Index : Yes/No

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶32

W.P.No.28958 of 2024

¶33

Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order av

S. SOUNTHAR, J.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram.

¶38

The Tashildar, Taluk Office, Solinganallur.

¶39

W.P No.28958 of 2024

¶40

03.10.2024

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

A.Roopavathi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Roopavathi v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaverichetti Vs the Arbitrator Cum District Collector

Sathish Kumar Vs the Arbitrator Cum District Collector

M.Krishnan Vs the Arbitrator Cum District Collector

M.Munusamy Vs the District Collector

C.Somasundaram Vs the District Collector

Kamarudeen Vs the District Colelctor