S.Murugesan v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Two writ petitions seeking MACP financial upgradations against Railway and Tribunal orders were dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioners despite sufficient opportunity.
What the court decided
W.P.Nos.2893 & 2897 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN
W.P.Nos.2893 & 2897 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.3154 & 3161 of 2019
W.P.No.2893 of 2019
S.Murugesan
... Petitioner
Vs.
- Union of India, Represented by the Chairman, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001.
- Union of India, Represented by the General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai - 600 003.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Murugesan
- respondent
Union of India (Chairman, Rail Bhavan)
- respondent
Union of India (General Manager, Southern Railway)
- respondent
The Chief Personnel Officer, Southern Railway
- respondent
The Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Tiruchirappalli Division
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court