A Co-operative Audit employee challenged an order refusing to declare his probation and sought retrospective declaration of probation and promotion to Senior Co-operative Auditor. The court noted that probation had since been declared and promotion granted, so nothing survived, and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.28789 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.06.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI
W.P.No.28789 of 2011 and MP.Nos.1 of 2012 & 2 of 2011
K. Suthandira Mohan
Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.318/2011 A.Pa.A.1, dated 22.08.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to declare the petitioner' probation and promote the petitioner to the post of Senior Coop.Auditor with retrospective effect from 28.07.1995.
Page No.1 of 5
W.P.No.28789 of 2011
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar for R2
O R D E R
The proceedings Na.Ka.No.318/2011 A.Pa.A1 dated 22.08.2011 issued by the 2nd respondent is under challenge.
the employees from service and they approached the TNAT for regularising their service and not to remove them from the said post. TNAT passed orders
Page No.2 of 5
W.P.No.28789 of 2011
issuing direction to the Government to regularise their services and the Government by accepting the Order of the Tribunal passed G.O.Ms.No.445 Finance (Coop.Audit) Department dated 20.12.2005 with retrospective effect from 16.10.1989.
W.P.No.28789 of 2011
respondent his probation was not declared and the impugned order came to be passed hence this writ petition.
12.06.2024
Neutral Citation: Yes/No dpq
Page No.4 of 5
W.P.No.28789 of 2011
R. KALAIMATHI, J.
dpq
To
W.P.No.28789 of 2011
12.06.2024
Page No.5 of 5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order refusing to declare the petitioner's probation could be quashed and probation declared retrospectively with promotion as Senior Co-op Auditor.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Suthandira Mohan
The Director of Coop.Audit, Chennai
The Assistant Director of Coop.Audit, Villupuram
R. Kalaimathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
