Dismissed

Mr. Rajendran Chingaravelu, v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC17 Dec 2024WP/27038/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition concerning conveyance of common areas from a developer to a village panchayat under the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Building Rules was withdrawn by the petitioner with an endorsement; the Court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate forum; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.

Mr. Rajendran Chingaravelu, Vs Government of Tamil… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.27038 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.12.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

W.P.No.27038 of 2018 and WMP.No.31434 of 2018

¶7

Rajendran Chingaravelu

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Government of Tamil Nadu

¶11

Rep. By its Secretary Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai.

¶12

The Director

¶13

Directorate of Town and Country Planning, Chengalvarayan Building

¶14

4^th floor, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶15

Nallambakkam Village Panchayat rep.by its President Nallambakkam,

¶16

Changalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶17

Unitech Limited

¶18

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.27038 of 2018

¶21

having registered Office at No.6, Community Centre, Saket, New Delhi 110 017. .... Respondents

¶22

Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to order dated 25.06.2018 passed by the 2^nd respondent and quash the same and direct the 2^nd respondent to secure conveyance of all common areas including streets, lanes, passages, pathways from the 4^th respondent in favour of the 3^rd respondent in compliance with Rule 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Building Rules and their undertaking dated 01.10.2009.

¶23

For Petitioner : M/s.Giridhar and Sai

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar Govt. Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.K.T.Devendran for R3 Mr.A.Umasankar for R4

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission

¶27

of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle, today, to that effect.

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.27038 of 2018

¶31

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the

¶32

petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶33

17.12.2024

¶34

dpq Index: Yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order

¶35

¶36

The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai.

¶37

The Director

¶38

Directorate of Town and Country Planning, Chengalvarayan Building

¶39

4^th floor, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶40

Nallambakkam Village Panchayat rep.by its President Nallambakkam,

¶41

3/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P.No.27038 of 2018

¶44

Changalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶45

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶46

dpq

¶47

W.P.No.27038 of 2018 and WMP.No.31434 of 2018

¶48

17.12.2024

¶49

4/4

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mr. Rajendran Chingaravelu, v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Rajendran Chingaravelu, v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Loganathan Vs Deputy Registrar of

P.Chakravarthy Vs The Commissioner

Mahalakshmi Vs the Secretary

Dharmamurthi Rao Bahadur Calavala Vs the District Collector

K.Manimaran Vs the Deputy Registrar of Co- Operative Societies

R.Selvakumar Vs Senior Revenue Officer