Dismissed

P.Palaniyandy v. the Secretary

Madras HC6 Jun 2024WP/26997/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of disciplinary proceedings. The petitioner, through counsel, submitted that they are no longer pressing the writ petition. The Court consequently dismissed the writ petition as not pressed and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed; consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

P.Palaniyandy Vs the Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.26997 of 2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 06.06.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶7

W.P.No.26997 of 2013 and

¶8

M.P.No.01 of 2013

P.Palaniyandy

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Secretary, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, Chennai - 104.

¶13

The Registrar, Disciplinary Committee, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, Chennai - 600 104.

¶14

Pon.Jeyaselan

¶15

M.Krishnakumar

¶16

N.Kanniappan

¶17

The Registrar, Disciplinary Committee Bar Council of India, 21, Rose Avenue Institutional Area, New Delhi - 110 002. ... Respondents

¶18

[R6 impleaded as per order dated 03.06.2024 in W.M.P.No.1658 of 2023 in W.P.26997 of 2013 by SMSJ and CKJ)

¶19

Page No.1 of 4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P.No.26997 of 2013

¶22

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, call for the records of 2nd respondent and quash the proceedings in DCC.No.10 and 11 of 2013 in Resolution No.110 and 111 of 2018 both dated 06.07.2013 passed by the 2nd respondent.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.J.J.Rajasuriya For R1 and R2 : Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar For R3 and R4 : Mr.S.Gajapathi Krishnan For R5 : No appearance

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

( Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.)

¶26

Mr.J.T.Rajasuriya, learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that

¶27

the petitioner is not pressing the writ petition.

¶28

2. In view of the above submission, this Writ Petition stands

¶29

dismissed as not pressed . No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

[S.M.S.J.] [C.K.J.] 06.06.2024 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No veda

¶31

Page No.2 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.No.26997 of 2013

¶34

¶35

The Secretary, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, Chennai - 104.

¶36

The Registrar, Disciplinary Committee, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, Chennai - 600 104.

¶37

The Registrar, Disciplinary Committee Bar Council of India, 21, Rose Avenue Institutional Area, New Delhi - 110 002.

¶38

Page No.3 of 4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.No.26997 of 2013

¶41

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN,J.

¶42

veda

¶43

Order in W.P.No.26997 of 2013

¶44

06.06.2024

¶45

Page No.4 of 4

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Palaniyandy v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Palaniyandy v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Special Deputy Collector Vs Kanchana

P.Vijayakalyani Vs The State of Tamilnadu

S.Sridharan Vs the Registrar General

Sri M. Sivamani Vs the Secretary

S.Delam, Vs The Chairman

K.Subbiah Vs a. Thiruvenkatamoorthy