Disposed

Mrs.Pappa v. the Jamabandhi Officer

Madras HC10 Sept 2024WP/26616/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition for issuing a writ of mandamus, the Madras High Court directed the revenue authorities to consider the petitioners' representation dated 13.06.2024 concerning the mutational error in their parents' land patta and pass final orders within eight weeks after issuing notices to interested parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to issue notice to parties and consider petitioners' representation within eight weeks; pass final orders.

Mrs.Pappa Vs the Jamabandhi Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.26616 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 10.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P No.26616 of 2024

¶7

Mrs. Pappa

¶8

Mrs. Ramayammal

¶9

Mrs. Aathayi

¶10

...Petitioners

¶11

Vs.

¶12

The Jamabandhi Officer, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶13

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Namakkal District.

¶14

The Tahsildar, Rasipuam Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶15

Lakshmayee

¶16

K.Perumal

¶17

p.Tulasimani

¶18

Muthamma

¶19

Thangavel

¶20

Valli

¶21

Atthi @ Perumal

¶22

...Respondents

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5

1/5

W.P.No.26616 of 2024

Prayer:

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider and pass orders on the representations of the petitioners dated 05.10.2023, 25.04.2024 and 13.06.2024 and consequently issue a joint patta upon including the names of the petitioners.

¶28

For Petitioner : Mr.Illanchezian For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader

¶29

O R D E R

¶30

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 05.10.2023, 25.04.2024 and 13.06.2024 and issue a joint patta in the names of the petitioners and other legal heirs of the petitioners' parents Raman and Karuppayye.

¶31

It is the case of the petitioners that their parents Raman and Karuppayye owned 4.50 acres of the land in Kurukapuram Village, Rasipram Taluk, Namakkal District and the patta in respect of the said property was wrongly mutated in favour of the other legal heirs i.e., petitioners brothers

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶33

W.P.No.26616 of 2024

¶34

namely Kandhan, Muthan and Atthi @ Perumal. Therefore, the petitioners submitted the representation on various dates seeking cancellation of patta

¶35

issued in the name of some of the heirs and issue of patta in the names of all the legal heirs of original owners including the petitioners. The last of such representation was dated 13.06.2024 and the same has not been considered till date. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶36

Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader, who

¶37

takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioner would be considered on its own merits, within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court.

¶38

In view of the above submission of the learned Special Government Pleader, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.06.2024 and pass final orders, after issuing notice to the petitioners and respondents 4 to 10 and other interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶40

W.P.No.26616 of 2024

¶41

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶42

No costs.

¶43

10.09.2024

¶44

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order av

¶45

¶46

The Jamabandhi Officer, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶47

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Namakkal District.

¶48

The Tahsildar, Rasipuam Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

4/5

W.P.No.26616 of 2024

S. SOUNTHAR, J.

W.P No.26616 of 2024

10.09.2024

(1/2)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

Mrs.Pappa v. the Jamabandhi Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Pappa v. the Jamabandhi Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Pidari Ettiamman Trust Vs the District Collector

C.Loganathan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

C.Loganathan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Meenambal Vs The District Collector

G.Ezhilarasan Vs The secretary to Government

R.Rangarajan Vs The District Collector/Sole Arbitrator