Disposed

Sampoornam.a v. the District Collector

Madras HC5 Sept 2024WP/25823/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking cancellation of patta issued to the fifth respondent and issuance in petitioner's favor. The Court directed the Sub Collector to consider the petitioner's representation on merits within 8 weeks after notice to the fifth respondent, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation within 8 weeks after notice to the 5th respondent.

Sampoornam.a Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P No.25823 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P No.25823 of 2024

Sampoornam A

...Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶11

The Sub Collector, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶12

The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶13

The Tahsildar, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶14

Ezhumalai

¶15

...Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for

¶17

issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5

¶19

1/5

¶20

W.P No.25823 of 2024

¶21

representation dated 24.06.2024 also the recommendation made by the 4^th

¶22

respondent in f.vz;.$p.1/5008/2018, dated 15.11.2018 for cancellation and issuance of patta in petitioner's favour.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.Thamizhanban.N

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran for R1 to R4 Special Government Pleader

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondents to

¶27

consider her representation dated 24.06.2024 seeking cancellation of the patta issued in the name of the fifth respondent.

¶28

2. According to the petitioner, the property situated in S.Nos.26/3

¶29

and 26/4 was originally belonged to her mother namely, Chinnathaiammal. The portion of the above mentioned property was gifted to the fifth respondent by the mother of the petitioner by gift deed dated 20.07.1978 and the remaining property with an extent of 0.41 cents in S.No.26/3 and 0.23 ½ cent in S.No.26/4 was given to the petitioner under gift deed dated 01.06.2006. The revenue officials without considering the interest of the petitioner in the above

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶31

W.P No.25823 of 2024

¶32

mentioned property wrongly issued patta in the name of the fifth respondent in Patta No.945 and 802 mentioning more than the actual extent . Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation on 24.06.2024 seeking cancellation of the patta issued in the name of the fifth respondent and the same has not been considered. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶33

3. Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader, who

¶34

takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that the representation of the petitioner will be considered, on its own merits, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶35

4. In view of the same, without going into the merits of the claim

¶36

made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.06.2024 and pass final orders, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after issuing necessary notice to the fifth respondent.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶38

W.P No.25823 of 2024

¶39

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶40

costs.

¶41

05.09.2024

¶42

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order dna

¶43

¶44

The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶45

The Sub Collector, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶46

The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶47

The Tahsildar, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

¶49

W.P No.25823 of 2024

¶50

S.SOUNTHAR, J. dna

¶51

W.P No.25823 of 2024

¶52

05.09.2024

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

Sampoornam.a v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sampoornam.a v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Appakutty Vs the District Collector

I.Madhubala Vs the District Collector

G.Kannan Vs the District Collector

K.Viswakumar Kalingarayar Vs the District Collector

Lakshmipathy Vs the District Collector

B.Subha Vs the Tahsildar