Disposed

S.Nandhakumar v. the Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC2 Sept 2024WP/25603/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras directed the Collector to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the reclassification of agricultural land as house site within six weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without determining merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass final orders within six weeks.

S.Nandhakumar Vs the Inspector General of Registration — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P No.25603 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 02.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P No.25603 of 2024

S.Nandhakumar

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai 600 028.

¶11

The Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

¶12

The District Registrar, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

¶13

The Sub-Registrar, Kumarapalayam, Namakkal District.

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5

1/5

Prayer:

W.P No.25603 of 2024

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 31.07.2024 to reclassify and refix the market value of the petitioner's agricultural land in S.No.277/1A1B and 277/1A1C to the extent of 1.86 ½ acre situated at Ammani Village, Kumarapalayam, Namakkal District as per the circular issued by the first respondent in proceedings in No.15678/L1/2024, dated 16.05.2024.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondents : Mr.P.Harish for R1 to R4 Government Advocate

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondents to consider his representation dated 31.07.2024 seeking reclassification of the petitioner's land as agricultural land situated in S.Nos.277/1A1B and 277/1A1C at Ammani Village, Kumarapalayam, Namakkal District.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶24

W.P No.25603 of 2024

¶25

2. According to the petitioner, the land belonged to him in S.Nos.277/1A1B and 277/1A1C at Ammani Village, Kumarapalayam, Namakkal District, is the agricultural land and the same has been wrongly classified as house site and the guideline value for the same is also fixed treating as house site. The petitioner submitted a representation to the second respondent on 31.07.2024 seeking reclassification of the land, the same has not been considered. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶26

3. Mr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice

¶27

for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that the representation of the petitioner will be considered, on its own merits, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶28

4. In view of the same, without going into the merits of the claim

¶29

made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 31.07.2024

¶30

and pass final orders, on its own merits, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶32

W.P No.25603 of 2024

¶33

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶34

costs.

¶35

02.09.2024

¶36

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order dna

¶37

¶38

The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai 600 028.

¶39

The Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

¶40

The District Registrar, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

¶41

The Sub-Registrar, Kumarapalayam, Namakkal District.

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

W.P No.25603 of 2024

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dna

W.P No.25603 of 2024

¶47

02.09.2024

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

S.Nandhakumar v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Nandhakumar v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Jaya Educational Trust Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

Chandra Vs the District Revenue Officer

Sundararaju Vs the Tahsildar

M.Bharathkumar Vs Mr.a.Ilangovane

Mrs.Muniyammal Vs the Arbitrator Cum District Collector

Jeyalakshmi Vs Joint Sub Registrar NO.1 (District Registrar Cadre)