In an infructuous writ petition under Article 226, the High Court of Madras dismissed the challenge filed by D.Nagarajan since the relief sought became infructuous on petitioner’s instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.23971 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR
W.P No.23971 of 2024
D.Nagarajan ...Petitioner
Vs.
...Respondents
1/4
W.P.No.23971 of 2024
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to register the
document pertaining to the properties in S.Nos.47/1B, 47/2A2, 47/2A3, Valasaravakkam Village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Chennai District measuring an extent of 28,944sq.ft without insisting for No Objection Certificate from the fourth respondent and pass such further or other orders as are necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.
For Petitioner : M/s. C.Harini For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Shahjahan Special Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil Special Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication herein. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
2/4
W.P.No.23971 of 2024
20.09.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
av
To
3/4
W.P.No.23971 of 2024
S. SOUNTHAR, J.
av
W.P No.23971 of 2024
20.09.2024
D.Nagarajan
Inspector General of Registration
District Registrar
Sub - Registrar
Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement
S. Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
