Disposed

A.Sburamaniyam v. the District Collector

Madras HC14 Aug 2024WP/23175/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A common order disposing of writ petitions challenging eviction proceedings by a town panchayat. The court directed authorities to treat eviction notices as show cause notices, permitted petitioner explanation, and stayed coercive steps pending classification of lands and issuance of final orders.

What did the court decide?

Impugned proceedings treated as show cause notices; direction to allow explanations and stay coercive evictions.

A.Sburamaniyam Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.Nos.23175 of 2024 etc.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 14.08.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.D.KRISHNAKUMAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

¶8

W.P.Nos.23175, 23179, 23193, 23197, 23204 and 23206 of 2024

¶9

W.P.No.23175 of 2024:

¶10

A.SUBRAMANIYAM .. Petitioner

¶11

¶12

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

¶13

SALEM DISTRICT, SALEM-636 001.

¶14

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, METTUR DAM-1, SALEM DISTRICT.

¶15

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PANCHAYAT, COLLECTORATE, SALEM-636 001.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR METTUR TALUK, METTUR SALEM DISTRICT.

¶17

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER MECHERI SPECIAL GRADE TOWN PANCHAYAT DISTRICT MECHERI, SALEM DISTRICT.

¶18

G.TAMIL EZHANCHEZHIYAN Respondents

¶19

___________ Page 1 of 7_

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P.Nos.23175 of 2024 etc.

¶22

Prayer in W.P.No.23175 of 2024: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the Na.Ka. No.01/2024, dated 13.06.2024 issued by the 5th respondent, quash the same and consequently direct respondents 1 to 4 herein to provide house site patta to the petitioner in Survey No.229/1 situated in Mecheri Special Grade Town Panchayat, Alagagoundanoor, Mecheri, Salem District in the light of G.O.Ms. No.318, Revenue Department, dated 30.08.2019 within a stipulated time.

¶23

and batch cases

¶24

For the Petitioners in all : Ms.R.Ragapriya the writ petitions

¶25

For Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman in all the writ petitions Government Advocate

¶26

COMMON ORDER

¶27

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

¶28

The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are seeking quashment of the proceedings of the fifth respondent dated 13.6.2024 and 24.6.2024 and issuance of house site pattas.

¶29

___________ Page 2 of 7_

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.Nos.23175 of 2024 etc.

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that lands in Survey Nos.229/1 and 228/1 of Mecheri Special Grade Town Panchayat are classified as “Grama Natham” and a certificate to that effect has also been issued by the Village Administrative Officer on 1.2.2000, however, the fifth respondent has erroneously issued the impugned proceedings under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 directing the petitioners to evict from the lands in question, treating the classification of the lands to be “Pathai”.

¶33

Refuting the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Advocate, placing on record a copy of the 'A' Register, submitted that the lands in question are classified as “Pathai” and, therefore, the impugned proceedings do not warrant any interference.

¶34

At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in occupation of the lands in

¶35

___________ Page 3 of 7_

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.Nos.23175 of 2024 etc.

¶38

question for over 50 years and impugned proceedings directing eviction of the petitioners have been passed without following the provisions of the Act and, therefore, there is a crass violation of the principles of natural justice.

¶39

Under identical circumstances, in respect of similarly placed persons occupying the lands in the same survey numbers, a Division Bench of this Court, vide order dated 2.7.2024 passed in W.P.No.17402 of 2024 and batch cases, directed the respondent authorities to treat the impugned notices as show cause notices and permitted the writ petitioners therein to respond to the same. Upon consideration of the explanation, necessary orders were directed to be passed in a time bound manner.

¶40

Considering the aforesaid submissions made on either side

¶41

and the order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, referred supra, we dispose of the writ petitions with the following directions:

¶42

i. The impugned proceedings in these writ

¶43

petitions shall be treated as show cause

¶44

___________ Page 4 of 7_

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.Nos.23175 of 2024 etc.

¶47

notice;

¶48

ii. The petitioners shall submit their explanation in response to the show cause notices within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶49

iii. On receipt of the explanation/objections from the petitioners, the fifth respondent shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks.

¶50

iv. The fourth respondent shall in the interregnum

¶51

submit the details pertaining to the classification of the lands and the revenue records to the fifth respondent, to enable him consider the entire gamut and pass appropriate orders.

¶52

v. Till the orders are passed by the fifth respondent, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent authorities as against the writ petitioners.

¶53

Page 5 of 7

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

W.P.Nos.23175 of 2024 etc.

¶56

There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.25330, 25331, 25335, 25337, 25348, 25349, 25356,

¶57

25357, 25361, 25362, 25367 and 25369 of 2024 are closed.

¶58

(D.K.K., ACJ.) (P.B.B, J.) 14.08.2024 Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No sasi

¶59

To:

¶60

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR SALEM DISTRICT, SALEM-636 001.

¶61

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, METTUR DAM-1, SALEM DISTRICT.

¶62

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PANCHAYAT, COLLECTORATE, SALEM-636 001.

¶63

THE TAHSILDAR METTUR TALUK, METTUR SALEM DISTRICT.

¶64

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER MECHERI SPECIAL GRADE TOWN PANCHAYAT DISTRICT MECHERI, SALEM DISTRICT.

¶65

Page 6 of 7

¶66

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶67

W.P.Nos.23175 of 2024 etc.

¶68

THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.B.BALAJI, J.

¶69

(sasi)

¶70

W.P.Nos.23175, 23179, 23193, 23197, 23204 and 23206 of 2024

¶71

14.08.2024

¶72

___________ Page 7 of 7_

¶73

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Sburamaniyam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Sburamaniyam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vl.Spl 149, Thiruvathipuram Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Vs K.Anbazhagan

Government Of Tamil Nadu Vs T Sundarrajan

The Director of Elementary Education Vs J Prema Anitha

T.Piragasi Vs the Authorised Officer

R.Ramani Vs the Honourable Principal District and Sessions Judge

C.Magendran Vs the District Revenue Officer