Disposed

T.Ramamoorthy v. the District Collector

Madras HC9 Sept 2024WP/22789/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking directions to implement an order under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Court held that, in light of interim directions, the respondents could be approached by complaint for violations.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners are at liberty to lodge a complaint if respondents 5 and 6 violate the condition of peaceful possession; the police are directed to proceed in accordance with the law upon receipt.

T.Ramamoorthy Vs the District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.22789 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 09.09.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.22789 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.24817 of 2024

¶7

T.Ramamoorthy

¶8

C.Kannagi

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

-Vs-

¶11

The District Collector, Collectorate, Krishnagiri-635 115, Krishnagiri District.

¶12

The Sub Divisional Magistrate / Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri-635 001, Krishnagiri District.

¶13

The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Krishnagiri-635 115, Krishnagiri District.

¶14

The Inspector Of Police, C-3, Pochampalli Police Station, Krishnagiri-635 206, Krishnagiri District.

¶15

R.Uvanakumar

¶16

R.Chandrakumar ... Respondents

¶17

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying

¶18

Page 1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.22789 of 2024

¶21

for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to implement the order dated 24.08.2023 made in Mu.Mu.2520/2023/F passed by the second respondent, and ensure safety and security for our dignified life as per Section 3 r/w 4(2) and (3) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Citizens and Parents Act, 2007 and Rule 20 of the said Rules, 2009 by taking action against the respondents 5 and 6 by considering the petitioners' representations dated 10.01.2024, 14.06.2024, 18.06.2024 and 18.07.2024.

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Manokaran For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.J.Mohammed Sathik Government Advocate For R3 and R4 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R5 and R6 : Mr.S.N.Subramani ORDER

¶23

This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents 1

¶24

to 4 to implement the order dated 24.08.2023 made in Mu.Mu.2520/2023/F

¶25

passed by the second respondent, and ensure safety and security for our dignified life as per Section 3 r/w 4(2) and (3) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and Rule 20 of the said Rules, 2009 by taking action against the respondents 5 and 6 by considering the petitioners' representations dated 10.01.2024, 14.06.2024, 18.06.2024 and 18.07.2024.

¶26

Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶27

In view of the interim direction passed by this Court dated 05.09.2024,

¶28

the respondents 5 and 6 partly complied with the order and insofar as the Page 2 of 4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.22789 of 2024

¶31

interference of the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment in their residence is concerned, whenever the 5 th and 6 th respondents violated the said condition, the petitioners are at liberty to lodge a complaint. On receipt of the same, the fourth respondent is directed to proceed in accordance with law.

¶32

With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

09.09.2024

¶34

Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No mn

¶35

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

¶36

¶37

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

Page 3 of 4