Disposed

R.Usharani @ Usha Bai v. the Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition)

Madras HC2 Aug 2024WP/22101/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider a representation regarding pending land acquisition compensation. The High Court directed the petitioner to appear for a scheduled enquiry and ordered the respondents to pass appropriate orders on merits within three months.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to appear on 12.08.2024; the respondents were directed to pass orders on merits within three months.

R.Usharani @ Usha Bai Vs the Special Tahsildar (Land… — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP.No.22101 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 02.08.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

WP.No.22101 of 2024

¶7

R.Usharani @ Usha Bai .. Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

1.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Mahabalipuram – Puducherry National Highway Scheme No.6, Varatharajan Street, Vedachalam Nagar Chengalpattu – 603 305

¶10

2.The Collector Chengalpattu District Collectorate Campus Chengalpattu District

¶11

.. Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.03.2024 and to disburse the compensation.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Chellamuthu

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan Additional Government Pleader

¶15

ORDER

¶16

With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final

¶17

disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/4

¶20

WP.No.22101 of 2024

¶21

This Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.03.2024 and to disburse the compensation.

¶22

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶23

It is the case of the writ petitioner that the petitioner's land was proposed to be acquired, however, no order is passed in this regard. Hence, the petitioner made a representation on 09.03.2024 seeking for completion of the acquisition proceedings and disbursement of the compensation, which is pending without consideration till date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶24

It is stated by the learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions that the first respondent has scheduled an enquiry on 12.08.2024, the petitioner can participate in the enquiry and the petitioner's grievance would be addressed.

¶25

Such view of the matter, let the petitioner appear before the first respondent on 12.08.2024, thereafter the respondents shall pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/4

WP.No.22101 of 2024

thereafter.

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

02.08.2024

¶31

dhk Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶32

¶33

1.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Mahabalipuram – Puducherry National Highway Scheme No.6, Varatharajan Street, Vedachalam Nagar Chengalpattu – 603 305

¶34

2.The Collector Chengalpattu District Collectorate Campus Chengalpattu District

¶35

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/4

WP.No.22101 of 2024

dhk

W.P.No.22101 of 2024

02.08.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/4

R.Usharani @ Usha Bai v. the Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Usharani @ Usha Bai v. the Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.S.Bharanidharan Vs R.Velraj

S.Shyamala Vs the Sub Registrar

B.R.Premavani Vs The Sub-Registrar

Selvakumar Vs the Tahsildar

R.Selvarajan Vs the Tahsildar

S.Anandhan Vs the Tahsildar