Disposed

R.Velu v. the Principal Rvenue Secretary

Madras HC2 Aug 2024WP/21763/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the third respondent to reconsider the petitioner's representation dated 22.05.2018 regarding the correction of survey number in revenue records. The writ petition was disposed of without going into merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to third respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 22.05.2018, give notice to interested parties, and pass orders within two months.

R.Velu Vs the Principal Rvenue Secretary — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP.No.21763 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 02.08.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

WP.No.21763 of 2024

R.Velu

.. Petitioner

Versus

The Principal Revenue Secretary Secretariat Government of Tamil Nadu Chennai

¶11

2.The District Collector Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur

¶12

3.The District Revenue Officer Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur

¶13

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur

¶14

5.The Tahsildar Poonamallee Taluk Poonamallee, Thiruvallur District

¶15

6.The District Collector Kancheepuram

¶16

7.The Revenue Divisional Officer

¶17

Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/6

¶19

WP.No.21763 of 2024

¶20

8.The Tahsildar Sriperumbudur Taluk

¶21

Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District

¶22

9.Sathish 10.Nathiya .. Respondents

¶23

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 7 to take appropriate actions on the petitioners representation dated 22.05.2018 and to make suitable correction in the revenue records including survey No, extent and FMB sketch for the Survey No.400/3, 400/4, 400/5 and 400/6 and their

¶24

extent and grant a patta for his survey number as 400/5 instead of survey

¶25

number 400/4 with correct measurement of 4466 square feet (26 X 164 feet).

¶26

For Petitioner : Mr.V.P.Dhillibabu

¶27

For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran for R1 to R8 Special Government Pleader

¶28

ORDER

¶29

This writ petition is filed directing the respondents 1 to 7 to take

¶30

appropriate actions on the petitioners representation dated 22.05.2018 and to

¶31

make suitable correction in the revenue records including survey No, extent and FMB sketch for the Survey No.400/3, 400/4, 400/5 and 400/6 and their

¶32

extent and grant a patta for his survey number as 400/5 instead of survey

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

2/6

¶35

WP.No.21763 of 2024

¶36

number 400/4 with correct measurement of 4466 square feet (26 X 164 feet).

¶37

By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Since no adverse order is passed against the private respondents, notice to them is dispensed with.

¶38

Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.

¶39

It is the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner's land is S.No.400/5, however, while granting patta, survey number is wrongly mentioned as S.No.400/4. In fact, S.No.400/4, belongs to the neighbourer. IN this regard, the petitioner has given a representation which is pending without consideration till date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶40

Considering the limited relief sought for in this writ petition, this Court without going into the merits of the case directs the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.05.2018 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners and any other interested person. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/6

WP.No.21763 of 2024

copy of this Order.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶46

02.08.2024

¶47

dhk Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶48

¶49

The Principal Revenue Secretary Secretariat Government of Tamil Nadu Chennai

¶50

2.The District Collector Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur

¶51

3.The District Revenue Officer Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur

¶52

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur

¶53

5.The Tahsildar Poonamallee Taluk Poonamallee, Thiruvallur District

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

4/6

¶56

WP.No.21763 of 2024

¶57

6.The District Collector Kancheepuram

¶58

7.The Revenue Divisional Officer Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District

¶59

8.The Tahsildar Sriperumbudur Taluk Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶61

5/6

¶62

WP.No.21763 of 2024

¶63

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

dhk

W.P.No.21763 of 2024

02.08.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶68

6/6

R.Velu v. the Principal Rvenue Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Velu v. the Principal Rvenue Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.S.Bharanidharan Vs R.Velraj

S.Shyamala Vs the Sub Registrar

B.R.Premavani Vs The Sub-Registrar

Selvakumar Vs the Tahsildar

R.Selvarajan Vs the Tahsildar

S.Anandhan Vs the Tahsildar