A writ petition seeking mandamus to direct authorities to take action against unauthorized hospital construction was disposed of. The court accepted the respondent's submission that steps are being taken for compliance without granting specific relief.
The writ petition stands disposed of with no orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.21671 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.03.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.21671 of 2019
P.Vasudevan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
.. Respondents
Page 1 of 5
W.P.No.21671 of 2019
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take necessary legal action against the unauthorized construction of the said hospital by name J.V.Hospital at No.31, Railway Border Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024.
For the Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Mohan
Mr.A.Arun Babu for R2 and R3
Mr.R.Mohan for R4
ORDER
(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard Mr.R.S.Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner,
Ms.P.Veena Suresh, learned Standing Counsel for respondent 1, Mr.A.Arun Babu, learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3 and Mr.R.Mohan, learned counsel for respondent 4.
construction has been carried out. Permission was only granted for stilt + 2 floors and excess construction has been carried out. Learned
Page 2 of 5
W.P.No.21671 of 2019
counsel for the petitioner further submits that permission ought not to have been granted for construction near the railway track.
the permission for construction. The said permission is granted in the year 1985 for construction of stilt + 2 floors.
the present writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no orders as to costs.
| (S.V.G., CJ.) |
(D.B.C., J.) 28.03.2024 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | : | Yes/No | ||
| Neutral Citation | : | Yes/No |
drm
Page 3 of 5
W.P.No.21671 of 2019
To
Page 4 of 5
W.P.No.21671 of 2019
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
(drm)
W.P.No.21671 of 2019
28.03.2024 (2/2)
Page 5 of 5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Vasudevan
The Chairman Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation
The Deputy Commissioner Zone No.10, Chennai Corporation
J.V.Hospital
Sanjay V.Gangapurwala
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
