Disposed

Aravind Kumar v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC2 Aug 2024WP/21634/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the first respondent to dispose of pending revision petitions filed by tenants under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act within 16 weeks, maintaining the status quo to prevent demolition during that period.

What did the court decide?

Direction to dispose of revision petitions within 16 weeks and maintain status quo until disposal of such petitions.

Aravind Kumar Vs the Secretary to Government — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.08.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶7

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶8

Mr.Aravind Kumar S/o K.Muniyandi .. Petitioner in WP.21634/2024 Mr.V.Sekar .. Petitioner in WP.21637/2024

¶9

¶10

The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Housing and Urban Development Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

¶11

The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority represented by its Member Secretary Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai 600 008

¶12

The Corporation of Chennai represented by its Commissioner Rippon Buildings No.1131, EVR Periyar Salai Park Town, Chennai 600 003

¶13

Page 1 of 7

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶16

The Executive Engineer, Zone XIII Corporation of Chennai Adyar, Chennai 600 020

¶17

The Assistant Engineer, Zone XIII.Div.174 Corporation of Chennai Adyar, Chennai 600 020

¶18

The Assistant Executive Engineer Zone IX-Unit 38 Corporation of Chennai Adyar, Chennai 600 020

¶19

Y.Ganesh

¶20

Y.Jeeva

¶21

.. Respondents in both the W.P's

¶22

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioners' revision filed under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 dated 14.06.2024 within a specific time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and further direct the respondents 4 to 6 not to proceed with their Letter No.13/00149/2024 dated 07.06.2024, pending the revisions dated 14.06.2024 before the first respondent.

¶23

For Petitioners :: Mr.J.Rajesh

¶24

For Respondents :: Mr.M.R.Gokulkrishnan Addl. Government Pleader for R1 Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan Standing Counsel for R2 Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel for R3 to R6

¶25

COMMON ORDER

¶26

(Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR,J.)

¶27

Page 2 of 7

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶30

These writ petitions are filed by the petitioners for issuance of a mandamus to the first respondent to consider the petitioners' revision petitions filed under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 dated 14.06.2024 within a specific time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and further direct the respondents 4 to 6 not to proceed with their Letter No.13/00149/2024 dated 07.06.2024, pending the revision petitions dated 14.06.2024 before the first respondent.

¶31

It is the case of petitioners that they are the tenants of the building situate at Block No.M4/2, Old No.18, New No.9/2, Ground Floor, Besant Nagar, Fourth Main Road, Chennai jointly owned by the respondents 7 & 8, who are in abroad. It is the case of petitioners that the building was constructed by Tamil Nadu Housing Board in the year 1970 and the landlords purchased the ground floor portion by a registered sale deed dated 04.09.2019. Now the petitioners are running juice/tatoo shop in the ground floor from September, 2020 to till date. It is further stated that there was no additional construction made in the said building, as the landlords have only

¶32

Page 3 of 7

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶35

refurbished the rest room area and erected a temporary aerocon panel partition. While so, all of a sudden, the respondents 4 to 6 have issued the impugned lock and seal and demolition notice dated 07.06.2024 citing unauthorised/deviated construction with a direction to the petitioners to restore the land to its original condition within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notice.

¶36

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that as against the impugned lock & seal and demolition notice, the petitioners have preferred revision petitions under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act before the first respondent and the same are pending. Hence, the learned counsel prays for an order directing the respondents to maintain status quo till the disposal of the statutory revision petitions filed by the petitioners.

¶37

Having regard to the consistent view taken by this Court in identical matters for early disposal of the revision by the Government and to maintain status quo in the meanwhile, the first respondent is hereby directed

¶38

_____________ Page 4 of 7_

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶41

to dispose of the revision petitions filed by the petitioners under Section 80A

¶42

of the Town and Country Planning Act on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time orders are passed in the revision petitions and communicated to the petitioners, the respondents are directed to maintain status quo. With this direction, the writ petitions are disposed of. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.23612 & 23615 of 2024 are closed. No costs.

¶43

Index : yes/no (S.S.S.R.,J.) (N.S.,J.) Neutral citation : yes/no 02.08.2024 ss

¶44

¶45

The Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

¶46

The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai 600 008

¶47

The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Buildings No.1131, EVR Periyar Salai Park Town, Chennai 600 003

¶48

_____________ Page 5 of 7_

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶51

The Executive Engineer, Zone XIII Greater Chennai Corporation Adyar, Chennai 600 020

¶52

The Assistant Engineer, Zone XIII.Div.174 Greater Chennai Corporation Adyar, Chennai 600 020

¶53

The Assistant Executive Engineer Zone IX-Unit 38 Greater Chennai Corporation Adyar, Chennai 600 020

¶54

Page 6 of 7

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶57

S.S.SUNDAR,J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.

¶58

¶59

W.P.Nos.21634 & 21637 of 2024

¶60

02.08.2024

¶61

_____________ Page 7 of 7_

¶62

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Aravind Kumar v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aravind Kumar v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Varalakshmi Vs Union of Territory of Puducherry

M/S.Coral Steel Vs the Canara Bank

M.Utthama Asirvatha Udaiyar Vs the Commissioner

L.Somu Vs the State of Tamilnadu

M.Kathirvel Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Shenbagavalli Vs The Assistant Registrar (Law)