This petition challenging 2003 transfer orders became infructuous and was disposed of because all 25 petitioners and 7 respondents had superannuated, rendering the orders irrelevant.
Writ petition closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.21356 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.08.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
W.P.No.21356 of 2004
Park Town, Chennai – 600 001.
.. Petitioners
vs
3.P.Selvam 4.R.Kathiravel 5.A.Rajendran 6.S.Palanisamy 7.G.Ganesan 8.V.Varadarajan 9.M.Dakshinamoorthy 10.P.Arumugam 11.Chellakkannu 12.N.Mohan 13.M.Ramasamy 14.S.Kalidasan 15.V.Perumal 16.C.Dhanraj 17.M.Kasi 18.C.M.Amalraj 19.K.Chellamuthu
1/4
W.P.No.21356 of 2004
20.S.Paramasivam 21.K.M.Andi 22.T.Sethuraman 23.M.Thangaraj 24.A.Noordeen 25.N.Bheesil 26.P.Ramalingam 27.S.Muniyandi 28.R.Narayanan 29.K.Kamaraj Babu
30.The Deputy Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai – 104. .. Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the order dated 09.12.2003 passed in Original Application No. 78 of 2003 by the 30th respondent and to quash the same and pass such other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case and thus render justice.
For Petitioners : Mrs.T.P.Savitha For Respondents : No appearance
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
The original application was filed by 25 persons challenging transfer orders of the seven respondents as early as in the year 2003.
2/4
W.P.No.21356 of 2004
the authorities in the remand proceedings.
i.e., 25 petitioners as well as 7 respondents have superannuated. Thus, the transfer orders, as of today, are not of any relevance.
infructuous. No costs. In light of the aforesaid, there is no necessity to order W.M.P.No.32062 of 2023 and the same is also closed.
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 07.08.2024
Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm
To
The Deputy Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai – 104.
3/4
W.P.No.21356 of 2004
DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J. and G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J
W.P.No.21356 of 2004
07.08.2024
4/4
Union of India
A. Mathialagan
N. Venkatachalam
P. Selvam
R. Kathiravel
A. Rajendran
Anita Sumanth
G. Arul Murugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
