Disposed

S.Shankarbabu v. State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC4 Jan 2024WP/20344/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court closed the Writ Petition challenging a tender notice, holding that due to the efflux of time and expiration of the tender period, no further adjudication was warranted. The petitioner was advised to approach the competent authority for any refund of deposit.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition and connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No further adjudication to be undertaken.

S.Shankarbabu Vs State of Tamil Nadu — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP.No.20344/2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 04.01.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

W.P.No.20344 of 2020

¶7

& WMP.Nos.25142 & 25143 of 2020

¶8

S.Shankarbabu ...Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

2.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶12

3.The Engineer-in-chief Engineer (Buildings), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶13

4.The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department (PWD), Technical Education Circle, DOTE Campus, Guindy, Chennai 600 025. ... Respondents

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP.No.20344/2020

¶17

PRAYER:

¶18

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the fourth respondent pertaining to his impugned Tender Notice NO.11 CE/TEC/2020-21 dated 07.12.2020 and to quash the same in so far as S.No:3 Package No:1 (slice 1 to 4) is concerned and consequently direct the fourth respondent to issue a fresh Tender Notice as an individual work in S.No.3 package 1(Slice 1 to 4).

¶19

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Esakkiappan For RR1 to 4 : Mr.G.Ameedias, Government Advocate

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The Tender notice dated 07.12.2020 and 08.12.2020 are under challenge in the present writ proceedings.

¶22

2.On account of efflux of time and due to the fact that the

¶23

periods stipulated in the tender notice for completion of the project has also been expired, no further adjudication is to be undertaken in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition.

¶24

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

WP.No.20344/2020

¶26

3.If any grievance exists regarding refund of deposit or otherwise, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent authority.

¶27

4.With these observations, the Writ Petition stands closed. No

¶28

costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶29

04.01.2024

¶30

Tsg Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order

¶31

¶32

1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶33

2.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶34

3/5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

WP.No.20344/2020

¶37

3.The Engineer-in-chief Engineer (Buildings), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶38

4.The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department (PWD), Technical Education Circle, DOTE Campus, Guindy, Chennai 600 025.

¶39

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

WP.No.20344/2020

¶41

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM , J.

Tsg

W.P.No.20344 of 2020

04.01.2024

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Shankarbabu v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Shankarbabu v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purasawalkam Santhatha Vs the Union of Indi, Rep. by Its

Zahiruddin Mohammed Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

V.Aravind Vs The New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Er. U.R. Srirangarajan, Vs the Chairman

Ponni Sugars (Erode) Ltd., Rep Vs the Chief Director (Sugar)

M/S.Annam Steels Private Ltd., Vs the Tamilnadu Tourism