Disposed

K.Babu v. the Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC25 Jul 2024WP/20252/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the Regional Transport Officer to receive and consider an auto-rickshaw permit application. The Court disposed of the petition by directing the Respondent to accept the application and decide it within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to receive the petitioner's auto-rickshaw permit application and consider it on merits within six weeks.

K.Babu Vs the Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No. 20252 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

W.P.No.20252 of 2024

¶7

K. Babu .. Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The Regional Transport Officer, Salem West, Salem District. ...Respondent

¶10

Prayer: This petition is filed under article 226 of the Constitution of

¶11

India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 03.07.2024 in Form CCPA

¶12

along with the prescribed fee through online for the grant of Auto

¶13

rickshaw permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 k.m distance from Salem Town Old Bus stand, Salem and to consider the same and

¶14

pass orders.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.A. Ganesan For Respondent : Mrs. C. Meera Arumugam Additional Government Pleader

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No. 20252 of 2024

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This petition is filed to seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 03.07.2024 in Form CCPA along with the prescribed fee paid by the petitioner through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 k.m distance from Salem Town Old Bus stand, Salem and to consider the same and pass orders.

¶21

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

¶22

learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.

¶23

The issue involved in the present Writ Petition was dealt within the earlier Writ Petition in W.P.No.9394 of 2024 dated 10.04.2024.This Court after considering the earlier passed in this regard, issued direction to the concerned Regional Transport Officer. Similar orders can also be issued in the present case, since, the said order will ensure to the benefit of the petitioner also.

¶24

In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to

¶25

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No. 20252 of 2024

¶27

the respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 03.07.2024 in form CCPA along with the prescribed fee paid by the petitioner through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit and consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶28

25.07.2024

¶29

Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Index : Yes/No smn To

¶30

The Regional Transport Officer, Salem West, Salem District.

¶31

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No. 20252 of 2024

¶33

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

smn

W.P.No.20252 of 2024

25.07.2024

1/2

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Babu v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Babu v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Asokan Vs the Secretary to Government

A.P.K.Vadivel Vs the Secretary to Government

M.Rajendiran Vs the Tahsildar

K.v.K.Nagaraj Vs the Commissioner

M/S.Indusind Bank Ltd., Vs the Joint Transport Commissioner (Rules)

H.Akbar Sheriff Vs the Regional Transport Officer