Writ petition challenging a municipality order against running a shop, filed under Article 226. The court noted an interim order had led to the impugned order and that a related writ petition was dismissed in 2022. Finding no infirmity, it dismissed this writ petition with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.19854 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.No.19854 of 2019
S.Manivel
.... Petitioner
Vs
The Commissioner, Chidambaram Municipality, Chidambaram. .... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent NAKA.No.1589/2018/A1 dated 12.06.2019 and quash the same and direct the respondent to run the shop pursuant to the proceedings dated 07.02.2019.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.P.Srinivas Standing Counsel
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order
passed by the respondent dated 12.06.2019.
Page 1 of 3
W.P.No.19854 of 2019
costs.
02.09.2024
Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Lpp To
The Commissioner, Chidambaram Municipality, Chidambaram.
Page 2 of 3
W.P.No.19854 of 2019
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
Lpp
W.P.No.19854 of 2019
02.09.2024
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent's order dated 12.06.2019 relating to running of the shop was infirm and should be quashed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Manivel
The Commissioner, Chidambaram Municipality, Chidambaram
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
