Dismissed

Ms.K.Roseline Geetha, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC15 Jul 2024WP/19658/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought quashing of proceedings refusing approval of the petitioner's appointment as S.G.Assistant in an aided primary school and direction to approve the appointment with benefits. The petitioner stated that a later official proceeding had appointed her Headmaster with effect from 12.03.2012, so nothing survived. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ms.K.Roseline Geetha, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.19658 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 15.07.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

W.P.No.19658 of 2015 and

¶7

W.M.P.No.338 of 2016

¶8

K.Roseline Geetha ... Petitioner

¶9

-vs-

¶10

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George,

¶11

Madras – 600 009.

¶12

2.The Director of Elementary Education,

¶13

DPI Campus, College Road,

¶14

Chennai – 600 006.

¶15

3.The District Elementary Educational Officer, The Office of the District Educational Officer, Coonoor, (Near Mount Pleasant), The Nilgiris.

¶16

Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.19658 of 2015

¶18

4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Kothagiri,

¶19

The Nilgiris – 643217.

¶20

5.The Correspondent, CSI Primary School, Burnside, Kotagiri – 643217, The Nilgiris. ... Respondents

¶21

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to Writ of Certiorarfied Mandamus, to calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings dated 08.06.2015 in Na.Ka.No.955/A1/2014 on the file of the 4^th respondent and quash the same, directing the respondents to approve the appointment of the petitioner Mrs.K.Roseline Geetha, as S.G.Assistant in C.S.I.Primary School, Burnside, Kothagiri, The Nilgiris – 643 217, w.e.f. 12.03.2012, with all service and monetary benefits.

¶22

: For petitioner Mrs.A.Arul Mary For R1 to R4 : Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari, Government Advocate For R5 : Mr.FR.V.John Kennedy

¶23

******

¶24

Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.19658 of 2015

¶26

O RDER

¶27

This writ petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings dated 08.06.2015 in Na.Ka.No.955/A1/2014 on the file of the 4^th respondent and quash the same, directing the respondents to approve the appointment of the petitioner Mrs.K.Roseline Geetha, as S.G.Assistant in C.S.I.Primary School, Burnside, Kothagiri, The Nilgiris – 643 217, w.e.f. 12.03.2012, with all service and monetary benefits.

¶28

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the light of the proceedings dated 26.05.2017 in Na.Ka.No.571/A2/2017 passed by the third respondent, wherein, the petitioner has been appointed as the Headmaster of the C.S.I.Primary School, Burnside, Kothagiri, The Nilgiris – 643 217, with effect from 12.03.2012, nothing survives for consideration of this Court in this Writ Petition and therefore, the matter has become infructuous.

¶29

Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.19658 of 2015

¶31

In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected W.M.P. stands closed. No costs.

¶32

15.07.2024

¶33

Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order ssa

¶34

¶35

1.The Additional Chief Secretary, The Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Madras – 600 009.

¶36

2.The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶37

3.The District Elementary Educational Officer, The Office of the District Educational Officer,

¶38

Page 4 of 6

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.No.19658 of 2015

¶41

Coonoor, (Near Mount Pleasant), The Nilgiris.

¶42

4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Kothagiri,

¶43

The Nilgiris – 643217.

¶44

5.The Correspondent, CSI Primary School, Burnside, Kotagiri – 643217, The Nilgiris.

¶45

Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.19658 of 2015

P.T.ASHA, J.,

ssa

W.P.No.19658 of 2015

¶50

15.07.2024

¶51

Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ms.K.Roseline Geetha, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ms.K.Roseline Geetha, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.K.Manmatharaj Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.

P.Dhanasekaran, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

The Management, Vs The Special Deputy

The Management of Vs the Presiding Officer

M.Tamilarasi, Vs The Member Secretary

S.Rajendran Vs The District Collector