Disposed

K.Ranjitha v. the Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC22 Jul 2024WP/19376/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Regional Transport Officer to accept the petitioner's online Form CCPA application for an Auto rickshaw permit, consider it on merits, and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Respondent to receive the petitioner's online Form CCPA application, consider it on merits, and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

K.Ranjitha Vs the Regional Transport Officer — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No. 19376 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

W.P.No.19376 of 2024

¶7

K. Ranjitha .. Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The Regional Transport Officer, Attur, Salem District. ...Respondent

¶10

Prayer: This petition is filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 24.06.2024 in Form CCPA

¶11

along with the prescribed fee through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 k.m distance from Attur Bus stand, Attur, Salem District and to consider the same and

¶12

pass orders.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.A. Ganesan

¶14

For Respondent : Mr. M. Venkateswaran

¶15

1/5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No. 19376 of 2024

¶18

Special Government Pleader

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This petition is filed to seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 2 4.06.2024 in Form CCPA along with the prescribed fee through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 k.m distance from Attur Bus stand, Attur, Salem District and to consider the same and pass orders.

¶21

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶22

The issue involved in the present Writ Petition was dealt within the earlier Writ Petition in W.P.No.9394 of 2024 dated 10.04.2024.This Court after considering the earlier passed in this regard, issued direction to the concerned Regional Transport Officer. Similar orders can also be issued in the present case, since, the said order will ensure to the benefit of the petitioner also.

¶23

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No. 19376 of 2024

¶25

In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 24.06.2024 in form CCPA along with the prescribed fee paid by the petitioner through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit and consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶26

22.07.2024

¶27

Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Index : Yes/No smn To

¶28

The Regional Transport Officer, Attur, Salem District.

¶29

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No. 19376 of 2024

¶31

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

smn

W.P.No.19376 of 2024

22.07.2024

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.No. 19376 of 2024

¶37

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Ranjitha v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Ranjitha v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Wakf Protection Forum Vs the Principal Secretary

S.Jeyaprakash Vs the Director of Town and Country Planning (Dtcp)

Syed Salaudin, Trustee Vs the Chairman

M.Ashtalakshmi Vs the State of Tamilnadu

M.Mullai Malar Vs the Commissioner

M.Arjunan Vs the Regional Transport Officer