ex parte decree was set aside later and the suit was ultimately dismissed for non prosecution by the judgment dated 12.03.2015. The order dismissing the suit in O.S.No.551of 2009 that became final, is admitted. However, based on the decree by which the suit itself was dismissed for non prosecution, it appears that the first petitioner has registered the decree and made a false claim on the basis of subsequent documents created inter se. Since the petitioners have come before this Court with unclean hands suppressing the material facts, this Court finds that the petitioners are not entitled to any relief from this Court by exercising our extraordinary jurisdiction. The petitioners have raised a dispute with regard to certain lands and appear to have filed this writ petition for a relief which they could not get from the civil Court on the admitted facts. Since the filing of the writ petition is motivated and the writ petition is devoid of any merit, this Court has no option but to dismiss the same. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.