Writ petition seeking reinstatement into forest service with quashing of two orders was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel endorsed that it had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.No.19114 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WP.No.19114 of 2018 WMP.Nos.22496 and 22497 of 2018
K.Chinnaraj
Petitioner
Vs
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi
For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh, GA
ORDER
When the matter is taken up today for consideration, the learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that this Writ Petition has become infructuous and hence, the same may be dismissed, as infructuous and also made an endorsement to that effect in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition. In
WP.No.19114 of 2018
BATTU DEVANAND, J.
Srcm
view of the said submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, recording the said endorsement, this Writ Petition is dismissed, as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected WMPs are closed.
18.03.2024
Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking Srcm
To
WP.No.19114 of 2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Chinnaraj
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Head of Forests Force, Chennai-15
The Conservator of Forests, Dharmapuri-5
The District Forest Officer, Dharmapuri
Battu Devanand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
