Disposed

C.Bakkiyavathi v. the Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC9 Jul 2024WP/18406/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a direction to the RTO to accept an online application for an auto-rickshaw permit. Relying on a prior order in W.P.No.9394 of 2024, the Court directed the RTO to receive the application and decide it on merits within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondent to receive the application and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

C.Bakkiyavathi Vs the Regional Transport Officer — Madras HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P.No. 18406 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

W.P.No.18406 of 2024

C.Bakkiyavathi

.. Petitioner

Versus

The Regional Transport Officer, Salem East, Salem District. ...Respondent

¶11

Prayer: This petition is filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 14.06.2024 in Form CCPA

¶12

along with the prescribed fee through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 k.m distance from Salem Town Old Bus stand, Salem and to consider the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.A. Ganesan

¶14

For Respondent : Mr. M.Venkateswaran

¶15

Special Government Pleader

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/4

¶18

W.P.No. 18406 of 2024

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This petition is filed to seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 14.06.2024 in Form CCPA along with the prescribed fee through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 k.m distance from Salem Town Old Bus stand, Salem and to consider the same.

¶21

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶22

The issue involved in the present Writ Petition was dealt within the earlier Writ Petition in W.P.No.9394 of 2024 dated 10.04.2024. This Court after considering the earlier order passed in this regard, issued a direction to the concerned Regional Transport Officer. Similar orders can also be issued in the present case, since, the said order will ensure to the benefit of the petitioner also.

¶23

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No. 18406 of 2024

¶25

In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 14.06.2024 in form CCPA along with the prescribed fee paid by the petitioner through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit and consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶26

09.07.2024

¶27

Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Index : Yes/No msv To

¶28

The Regional Transport Officer, Salem East, Salem District.

¶29

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No. 18406 of 2024

¶31

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

msv

W.P.No.18406 of 2024

09.07.2024

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.Bakkiyavathi v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Bakkiyavathi v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Revathi Vs the Government of Tmail Nadu

A.B.Venkatesan Vs the Joint Commissioner

T.Thamayanthi, Vs Tamilnadu Wakf Board

Mahalakshmi Vs Revenue Divisional Officer

A.Duraisamy Vs the Assistant Commissioner

K.Murugesan Vs the District Collector