Disposed

S.Jayaraj v. the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar

Madras HC11 Jul 2024WP/18228/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking direction to the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar to dispose of an online application for transfer of patta in respect of properties in Thiruvannamalai District. The High Court directed the respondent to consider the application and pass appropriate orders within two months, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the respondent to consider the petitioner's online application dated 01.11.2019 and pass appropriate orders on merits within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this o

S.Jayaraj Vs the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.18228 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.18228 of 2024

S.Jayaraj

... Petitioner

versus

The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Chetpet Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, d irecting the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's online application dated 01.11.2019 in Application No.2019/0103/06/151610 seeking transfer of patta in his name with respect to property situated at ThachchampadiViullage, Chetpet Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District comprised in Survey Nos.489/9, 435/4, 435/5, 489/5, 492/4, 489/3, 489/4 as the petitioner purchased the said properties vide sale deed dated 14.12.2007 in Doc.No.3138/2007.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Magesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.18228 of 2024

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

By consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

¶19

2. This Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondent to dispose of

¶20

the petitioner's online application dated 01.11.2019 in Application No.2019/0103/06/151610 seeking transfer of patta in his name with respect to property situated at Thachchampadi Village, Chetpet Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District comprised in Survey Nos.489/9, 435/4, 435/5, 489/5, 492/4, 489/3, 489/4 as the petitioner purchased the said properties vide sale deed dated 14.12.2007 in Doc.No.3138/2007.

¶21

3 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶22

4 . The case of the petitioner is that he made online application dated 01.11.2019 in Application No.2019/0103/06/151610 seeking transfer of patta in his name with respect to property situated at Thachchampadi

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.18228 of 2024

¶26

Village, Chetpet Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District comprised in Survey Nos.489/9, 435/4, 435/5, 489/5, 492/4, 489/3, 489/4. However, the same

¶27

had not been considered by the respondent. Hence, he seeks a direction.

¶28

5 . C onsidering the limited nature of the relief sought for in the

¶29

present Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the respondent to consider the online application of the petitioner dated 01.11.2019 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

6 . With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶31

No costs.

¶32

11.07.2024 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No msv To

¶33

The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Chetpet Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

W.P.No.18228 of 2024

¶37

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶38

msv

¶39

W.P.No.18228 of 2024

¶40

11.07.2024

¶41

4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Jayaraj v. the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Jayaraj v. the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Indramuthu, Vs the Additional Chief Secretar

S.Vivekanandan, Vs the District Registrar(Admin)

J.Ramamoorthy Vs Inspector General of Registration

S.Vasanthi Vs The Principal Secretary

Abdul Sait Vs the Thashildar

G.Prakash Vs the Sub Collector /