Disposed

Prestige Silver Springs Villa Owners Association v. Greater Chennai Corporation

Madras HC29 Jul 2024WP/17547/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought directions for the Corporation to consider a representation regarding internal roads gifted to it. The Court directed the respondent to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks, thereby disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider representation dated 22.04.2024 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

Prestige Silver Springs Villa Owners Association… — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.17547 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 29.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

W.P.No.17547 of 2024

¶7

M/s.Prestige Silver Springs Villa Owners Association Rep by its Secretary Mr.Amil Kumar Chebrolu The Club House, Prestige Selver Springs Dr.K.K.Salai, ECR-OMR link Road, Sholinganallur, Chennai -119. ...

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Greater Chennai Corportion Rep by its Commissioner, Ripon buildings, Chennai – 600 003.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the representation dated 22.04.2024 and pass appropriate orders under Section 120 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Arun Shabari For Respondent : Mr.G.T.Subramaniam, Standing Counsel.

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.17547 of 2024

¶18

This Writ Petition has been filed praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamusto direct the respondent to consider the representation dated 22.04.2024 and pass appropriate orders under Section 120 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special

¶20

Government Pleader for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶21

It is the grievance of the petitioner that the internal roads laid within the petitioner's association were gifted to the Greater Chennai Corporation, the same was sought to be treated as public roads and some persons who had lands behind the petitioner's villa sought to utilize the roads within the complex to reach their properties, though they had alternative routes available to them. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation to the respondent on 22.04.2024. However, the same has not been considered. Hence, he seeks a direction.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.17547 of 2024

¶25

The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that the

¶26

representation of the petitioner will be considered by the respondent in a reasonable time.

¶27

Considering the limited nature of the relief sought for in the present Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.04.2024 a nd pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶29

costs.

¶30

29.07.2024

¶31

Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶32

tsh

¶33

¶34

The Greater Chennai Corportion Rep by its Commissioner, Ripon buildings, Chennai – 600 003.

¶35

3/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.No.17547 of 2024

¶38

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

¶39

tsh

¶40

W.P.No.17547 of 2024

¶41

29.07.2024

¶42

4/4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Prestige Silver Springs Villa Owners Association v. Greater Chennai Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prestige Silver Springs Villa Owners Association v. Greater Chennai Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.J.Pappaiyan Vs the Member Secretary

S.Ashraf Bee Vs Tamilnadu Wakf Board

P.Govindharajan Vs the Regional Transport Officer

K.Parimala Vs the District Collector

C.Ravi Vs The District Collector

V.Meenal Vs the Commissioner