Dismissed

N.Jayavelu, EX.P.C.7704 v. Commissioner of Police

Madras HC21 Dec 2024WP/17530/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed the writ petition filed by N.Jayavelu seeking reinstatement in service. The Court held that the petition abated by operation of law as the original petitioner died in 2023, and no application to substitute legal heirs was filed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed as abated; legal representatives granted liberty to file appropriate application.

N.Jayavelu, EX.P.C.7704 Vs Commissioner of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.17530 of 2011

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.17530 of 2011 and

M.P.No.1 of 2014

N.Jayavelu

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Chennai 600 008.

¶12

2.Deputy Commissioner of Police, Triplicane Police District, Chennai City. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the record relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent herein in his proceedings in P.R.No.128//PR/CZ/2000 dated 26/04/2010 and the order passed by the first respondent herein in Appeal No.07/PR/CZ/2011, CZO.No.312/2011 dated 28.06.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential service and monetary benefits.

¶14

Page 1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.17530 of 2011

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Anbuchezhian For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate.

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

As early as on 14.06.2023, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the sole petitioner passed away. Thereafter, though the matter was adjourned from time to time on several occasions, till date no application is filed to bring the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner on record. Hence, the writ petition abated by operation of law. However, when the matter is listed today, once again request is made for grant of time for filing appropriate application. As already noted above, the matter is being adjourned from 14.06.2023, no application is filed till date.

¶20

In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to grant further time by keeping the matter pending before this Court. In view of the same, the writ petition is closed as abated. However, the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner are granted liberty to file appropriate application, if they are so advised, in accordance with law.

¶21

Page 2 of 4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.17530 of 2011

¶24

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. The connected

¶25

miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.

¶26

21.12.2024

¶27

dpa

¶28

Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶29

¶30

1.Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Chennai 600 008.

¶31

2.Deputy Commissioner of Police, Triplicane Police District, Chennai City.

¶32

Page 3 of 4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P.No.17530 of 2011

¶35

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

¶36

dpa

¶37

W.P.No.17530 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2014

¶38

21.12.2024

¶39

Page 4 of 4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.Jayavelu, EX.P.C.7704 v. Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Jayavelu, EX.P.C.7704 v. Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Executive Engineer, Vs T.Manivannan

S.N.Elumalai, Vs the Joint Registrar of

N.Kanniappan Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Mr.G.Rangarasu Vs the Managing Director

S.Vinumahesh Vs The Tamil Nad Civil Supplies

S.Meena, Vs The Director of Elementary