Dismissed

Ashers Restaurant and Services Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner

Madras HC19 Nov 2024WP/16934/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions for certiorari and mandamus seeking to quash an order revoking permission to carry out repair and beautification work and use for parking were dismissed. The court observed the impugned order was superseded by a subsequent order in a revision petition.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petitions dismissed as the impugned order is superseded by a subsequent order in a revision petition.

Ashers Restaurant and Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.Nos.16934 and 16935 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 19.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P.Nos.16934 and 16935 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.21017, 21018, 21019 and 21020 of 2020

¶7

ASHERS RESTAURANT AND SERVICES PVT LTD Represented by its Managing Director No.S4C, Phase 1, 2nd floor, Spencer Plaza, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002

¶8

... Petitioner (in both WPs)

¶9

vs.

¶10

1.The Commissioner

¶11

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶12

2.The Joint Commissioner,

¶13

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶14

3.The Executive Officer Arulmigu Siddhi Budhhi Vinayagar & Sunderaswarar Thirukovil, Muthu Street, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014.

¶15

4.Arulmigu Siddhi Budhhi Vinayagar & Sunderaswarar Thirukovil, Muthu Street, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014. ... Respondents (in both WPs)

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.Nos.16934 and 16935 of 2020

¶19

PRAYER in W.P.No.16934 of 2020: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to issuance of the order dated 01.09.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents permitting the petitioner herein to carry out the repair and beautification work in the leased premises bearing No.62, Cathedral road, Gopalapuram, Chennai – 600 086 for running the restaurant business forthwith.

¶20

PRAYER in W.P.No.16935 of 2020: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to issuance of the order dated 01.09.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent herein in revoking the permission granted to use vacant land belongs to the 4th respondent for car parking facility by the petitioner herein vide letter dated 17.05.2017 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents permitting the petitioner herein to use vacant land belongs to the 4th respondent for car parking facility by the petitioner herein for running their restaurant business as per the permission granted by the 3rd respondent vide letter dated 17.05.2017.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Harishankar (in both WPs) For R1 and R2 : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader (in both WPs) For R3 and R4 : Mr.A.K.Sriram for M/s.Kailasam Associates (in both WPs)

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.Nos.16934 and 16935 of 2020

¶25

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶26

When the writ petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel

¶27

appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 01.09.2019 was superseded by the order passed by the 1^st respondent in R.P.No.122/2021 D2, dated 01.11.2022 and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in these writ petitions.

¶28

The said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is

¶29

recorded and the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶30

19.11.2024

¶31

Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No dm

¶32

¶33

1.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶34

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/4

¶37

W.P.Nos.16934 and 16935 of 2020

¶38

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

¶39

¶40

W.P.Nos.16934 and 16935 of 2020

¶41

19.11.2024

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/4

Ashers Restaurant and Services Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashers Restaurant and Services Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Kumar Vs the District Collector

Coimbatore Corporation Contractors, Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its

Rathinabai Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

P.Ayyappan Vs The Manager

A.Sakthivel Vs The Commissioner

Dr.R.K.Sasankh Vs State of Tamilnadu