Suriya v. the State Represented by Its
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS…
What did the court decide?
7 days ordinary leave without escort granted to the convict from 17.07.2024 to 23.07.2024, with daily reporting to Kundrathur Police Station and surrender on 24.07.2024.
What the court decided
W.P.No.16873 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.07.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
W.P.No.16873 of 2024
Suriya
.. Petitioner/
Wife of the detenue
Versus
- The State represented by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.
- The Superintendent, Puzhal Central Prison - I, Puzhal - 600 066. .. Respondents
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a convict prisoner who has not completed three years of imprisonment under Rule 22(1)(c) may still be granted ordinary leave on compassionate grounds.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suriya (wife of the detenue Kothandan)
- respondent
The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Egmore, Chennai
- respondent
The Superintendent, Puzhal Central Prison - I, Puzhal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court