Dismissed

Ameesha Kasushai v. The Central Administrative Tribunal

Madras HC11 Nov 2024WP/16687/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interim order of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding a recruitment process. The brief order declined to grant interim relief, directing the petitioner to pursue claims in the pending original application before the Tribunal.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed; interim relief was denied.

Ameesha Kasushai Vs The Central Administrative Tribunal — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.16687 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.11.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

W.P.No.16687 of 2020

Ameesha Kaushal

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Central Administrative Tribunal,

¶11

Rep. By its Registrar, Chennai Bench, City Civil Court Complex, High Court Buildings, Chenna – 600 104.

¶12

2.The Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶13

3.The Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi – 110069.

¶14

4.The Director, National Industrial Security Academy, CISF NISA Campus, Nisa Hakimpet, Hyderabad, Telangana – 500 078.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Page 1 of 5

¶17

W.P.No.16687 of 2020

¶18

5.The Deputy Inspector General of police (Recruitment),

¶19

Central Reserve Police Force,

¶20

East Block No.7, Level – 04, Section – 01,

R.K.Puram,

New Delhi – 110 066.

... Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the impugned order dated 12.11.2020 passed in OA/310/490/2020 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, the 1^st respondent herein and quash the same insofar as it does not grant the interim prayer sought.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.Srujith Krishna for Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi For Respondents : Tribunal (for R1) Dr.G.Babu (for R2)

¶26

Central Government Standing Counsel Mr.Su.Srinivasan (for R3 to 5) Central Government Standing Counsel

¶27

ORDER

¶28

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. )

¶29

The present Writ Petition has been instituted challenging the interim order

¶30

passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Branch on 12.11.2020 in

¶31

O.A.No.490 of 2020.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Page 2 of 5

¶34

W.P.No.16687 of 2020

¶35

The Tribunal passed the interim order that the interviews and all selection process shall go on subject to the out come of the original application filed in O.A.No.490 of 2020. The matter was directed to be posted for final hearing for completion of pleadings on 21.01.2021. Almost 3.5 years lapsed. This Court has not granted any interim order in the present Writ Petition.

¶36

More so, the order impugned is to proceed with the selection process. However, subject to the outcome of the original application. Therefore, the rights of the petitioner is preserved and if at all he is aggrieved, he is at liberty to raise his contentions before the Tribunal in the Original Application, which is pending.

¶37

With these observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

¶38

[S.M.S., J.] [M.J.R., J.]

¶39

11.11.2024

¶40

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gd

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Page 3 of 5

W.P.No.16687 of 2020

1.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Rep. By its Registrar, Chennai Bench, City Civil Court Complex, High Court Buildings, Chenna – 600 104.

¶46

2.The Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶47

3.The Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi – 110069.

¶48

4.The Director, National Industrial Security Academy, CISF NISA Campus, Nisa Hakimpet, Hyderabad, Telangana – 500 078.

¶49

5.The Deputy Inspector General of police (Recruitment), Central Reserve Police Force, East Block No.7, Level – 04, Section – 01, R.K.Puram, New Delhi – 110 066.

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

Page 4 of 5

¶52

W.P.No.16687 of 2020

¶53

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

W.P.No.16687 of 2020

11.11.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 5 of 5

Ameesha Kasushai v. The Central Administrative Tribunal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ameesha Kasushai v. The Central Administrative Tribunal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Vivek @ Vivekanandhan Vs State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by

C.Sankaralingam Vs the Director

Jancy Rani Vs the Secretary to Government

S.Srividhya Vs The Deputy Director

J.Moorthi Vs Union of inida

Suresh Rajan Vs the Union of India, Rep. by